=B1H=A5=F3=AA=CC: openbmc &= lt;openbmc-bounces+chris.chen3=3Dflex.com@lists.ozlabs.org> =A5N=AA=ED C= hris Chen (TPI) <Chris.Chen3@flex.com>
=B1H=A5=F3=A4=E9=B4=C1: 2021=A6~9=A4=EB7=A4=E9 =A4U=A4=C8 05:52
=A6=AC=A5=F3=AA=CC: Andrei Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com>; = openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
=A5D=A6=AE: =A6^=C2=D0: =A6^=C2=D0: [phosphor-host-ipmid] Questions = about IPMI (OEM) command development

Hi Andrei,

One more thing would like to consult you is I have tried to add our own xxx= -ipmi-oem, but got the "Insufficient privilege level" feedback af= ter executing an oem command. However, it would be successful in case I rem= oved intel-ipmi-oem. Do you have experience with this? If yes, may I know how to fix it?

I currently would like to keep leveraging the intel-ipmi-oem until I integr= ate the commands I needed into our own xxx-ipmi-oem.

Thank you.

Regards,

Chris Chen

=B1H=A5=F3=AA=CC: openbmc= <openbmc-bounces+chris.chen3=3Dflex.com@lists.ozlabs.org> =A5N=AA=ED= Chris Chen (TPI) <Chris.Chen3@flex.com>
=B1H=A5=F3=A4=E9=B4=C1: 2021=A6~9=A4=EB7=A4=E9 =A4W=A4=C8 08:35
=A6=AC=A5=F3=AA=CC: Andrei Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com>; = openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
=A5D=A6=AE: =A6^=C2=D0: =A6^=C2=D0: [phosphor-host-ipmid] Questions = about IPMI (OEM) command development

Hi Anrdrei,

Thank you for your helpful comments.

Regards,

Chris Chen

=B1H=A5=F3=AA=CC: Andre= i Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com>
=B1H=A5=F3=A4=E9=B4=C1: 2021=A6~9=A4=EB6=A4=E9 =A4U=A4=C8 06:15
=A6=AC=A5=F3=AA=CC: Chris Chen (TPI) <Chris.Chen3@flex.com>; o= penbmc@lists.ozlabs.org <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
=A5D=A6=AE: Re: =A6^=C2=D0: [phosphor-host-ipmid] Questions about IP= MI (OEM) command development

Hello,

I don't represent Intel, but have some considerations about this topic:
1) Try to not reuse intel-ipmi-oem. Much better solution would be to
create your own xxx-ipmi-oem package and implement only methods you
really need.
2) Better way would be to implement required logic in phosphor-host-
ipmid and submit changes there. I didn't investigate this yet since we
also pull intel-ipmi-oem to our project, but I believe, it should not
be too difficult. Don't repeat our mistakes ).
3) There is priority argument which you can use to determine handler
call order.
4) Most functions there are specific for Intel servers, so the useless
even is you use Intel CPUs but your own platform.
5) Use "journalctl -t ipmid -o pretty-json" or something like thi= s. But
now it is recommended to use new syntax:
https://urldefense.com/v= 3/__https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-logging/blob/master/docs/structured= -logging.md__;!!HSntlCg!G61XcVxUr8Hli8HqIlebVYji3tTPXsn33W5oyo-FlU8fbm6Zd66= S0H6cseru6Bcw$

On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 09:40 +0000, Chris Chen (TPI) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess this mail was got overwhelmed by bunches of emails, so please<= br> > let me resend it and hope someone could help me. Another, I add one > more question marked #5 below.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Chris Chen
>
> =B1H=A5=F3=AA=CC: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+chris.chen3=3Dflex.com@l= ists.ozlabs.org> =A5N=AA=ED
> Chris Chen (TPI) <Chris.Chen3@flex.com>
> =B1H=A5=F3=A4=E9=B4=C1: 2021=A6~9=A4=EB2=A4=E9 =A4U=A4=C8 06:34
> =A6=AC=A5=F3=AA=CC: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.= org>
> =A5D=A6=AE: [phosphor-host-ipmid] Questions about IPMI (OEM) command > development
> Hi all,
>
> I have studied "phosphor-host-ipmid" package for a couple of= weeks and
> got understanding that it has implemented some mandatory and optional<= br> > commands already. And I also knew that I'm able to leverage "inte= l-
> ipmi-oem" package to get more command handlers. But there're some=
> questions raised in my mind, I hope someone could give me some
> suggestions.
>    1. What's the normal development procedure in case I= want to make
> our own OEM commands? I mean do you guys encourage me to create a new<= br> > "xxx-ipmi-oem" package or to leverage "intel-ipmi-oem&q= uot; and then add our
> own commands in it?
>    2. I for now added "intel-ipmi-oem" packag= e only for using its
> "<Chassis>:<Set Front Panel Enables>" command be= cause I figured out the
> same command in the "phosphor-host-ipmid" is not able t= o match the d-
> bus interface in the "x86-power-control". I'm not sure if I = will need
> other commands in the "intel-ipmi-oem", but what if I don't = need other
> commands, how to remove them? to use the whitelist mechanism?
>    3. Is it okay to add more than 1 xxx-ipmi-ome packag= es? If yes, how
> to manage the whitelist between these 2 OEM packages?
>    4. Am I able to use "intel-ipmi-oem" = on a platform that is using AMD
> CPU?
>    5. How to print the "entry("SENDER=3D%s&qu= ot;, sender.c_str())" parts? I
> mean I for now can print out "Set up ipmi context" string af= ter
> following the instruction listed in
> "https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/= openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Debugging-OpenBMC*enabling-application-debug__;Iw!!HSn= tlCg!G61XcVxUr8Hli8HqIlebVYji3tTPXsn33W5oyo-FlU8fbm6Zd66S0H6csVZtHYM2$
> ", but I don't see "SENDER=3D" when I executed "jo= urnalctl -t ipmid"
> command.
>    6.    1. log<level::DEBUG>(&quo= t;Set up ipmi
> context",entry("SENDER=3D%s",sender.c_str()), &nb= sp;
> entry("NETFN=3D0x%X", netFn),entry("LUN=3D0x%X", l= un), &= nbsp;
> entry("CMD=3D0x%X", cmd),entry("CHANNEL=3D%u", cha= nnel), =
> entry("USERID=3D%u", userId), &nb= sp;
> entry("SESSIONID=3D0x%X", sessionId), &n= bsp;
> entry("PRIVILEGE=3D%u",static_cast<uint8_t>(privilege)= ),
> entry("RQSA=3D%x", rqSA));
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Chris Chen
> Legal Disclaimer :
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential.
> It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it<= br> > is addressed
> or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intende= d
> recipient,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, > please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of=
> this message!

--
Best regards,
Andrei Kartashev