RE: Openbmc u-boot trees (was Re: u-boot:rsa adds rsa3072 algorithm)

From: ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Zev Weiss <zweiss@equinix.com>
Cc: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
	"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Troy Lee <troy_lee@aspeedtech.com>,
	Steven Lee <steven_lee@aspeedtech.com>,
	Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>,
	Dylan Hung <dylan_hung@aspeedtech.com>
Subject: RE: Openbmc u-boot trees (was Re: u-boot:rsa adds rsa3072 algorithm)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 01:47:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <HK0PR06MB37798E753FC015030DF2F9A991349@HK0PR06MB3779.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPK8XfM+jNJ6bsABCPgGYWDg7bczjKKFjmA=Lzbi166nSOjbw@mail.gmail.com>

> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 10:11 AM
> 
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 02:29, ChiaWei Wang
> <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com> wrote:
> > > I would like to see fewer trees.
> > >
> > > In the short term, one option is we put all of the openbmc patches
> > > in the SDK, and continue using that for openbmc. Would this work for
> aspeed?
> >
> > Yes.
> > Are we going to do this through PRs as usual?
> 
> Works for me. I've sent two PRs with the obvious changes:
> 
>  https://github.com/AspeedTech-BMC/u-boot/pull/9
> 
>  https://github.com/AspeedTech-BMC/u-boot/pull/8
> 
> We need to work out how to arrange the defconfigs. Would you like to see
> openbmc using one of the defconfigs you maintain, or should we keep a
> seperate one?
> 
> configs/evb-ast2600-cot_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-ecc_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-emmc_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-spl_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-spl-ecc_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-spl-ncsi_defconfig
> configs/evb-ast2600-spl-tiny_defconfig

These evb-ast2600-xxx defconfigs are still used by Aspeed customers who are not moving on to OpenBMC yet.
Let's keep them separated until the legacy Aspeed SDK is phased out.
After then, we can work on merging these defconfigs with those of openbmc for simplicity.

Regards,
Chiawei

> 
> The openbmc ones are here:
> 
> configs/ast2600_openbmc_defconfig
> configs/ast2600_openbmc_spl_defconfig
> configs/ast2600_openbmc_spl_emmc_defconfig
> 
> The openbmc and openbmc_spl defconfigs are legacy and not tested by myself.
> I actively maintain the openbmc_spl_emmc configuration as it supports the
> rainier/everest
> 
> > > In the medium term, we should start using upstream releases. There
> > > may still be some downstream code (as we have for Linux in our dev
> > > branches), but this will go to zero over time.
> >
> > Agree.
> > We are also working on upstreaming fundamental drivers to U-Boot
> mainline.
> > Once it is sufficient for most frequently used booting paths, Aspeed will start
> using it.
> 
> Excellent. Thank you for your work in this area.