From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1372C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4752664F1C for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4752664F1C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DrwLG6DwDz3d6b for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 02:50:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=gGQfHTPB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmx.net (client-ip=212.227.15.15; helo=mout.gmx.net; envelope-from=j.neuschaefer@gmx.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=gGQfHTPB; dkim-atps=neutral X-Greylist: delayed 357 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:49:48 AEDT Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DrwKm3cMSz30M3 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 02:49:47 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1614872984; bh=VPzS3XtaV2jscfNrk2ckzZDmYf8qCvklrXC7Xl+tdY8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gGQfHTPBOkyvvUgThgguY82/3w58geLqNHdLTAiZ+sGNw0zonSCERkoZoL8MaLluc CtJ4NrKblbf00yoQLb+LYdRB8k1vVRh26ylCtwfYne29IP2GiHp/T8RgumIM15790E Ga7DtuFOptoRLHjpUEpAB/nioJfNK3RYFfYcZ5A8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from longitude ([37.201.215.134]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N1wlv-1lkSgz3l9N-012I0C; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:42:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:42:07 +0100 From: Jonathan =?utf-8?Q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?= To: Tomer Maimon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] ARM: dts: Add board-specific compatible string to npcm750-evb devicetree Message-ID: References: <20210303154622.3018839-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> <20210303154622.3018839-2-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jauI0NPFqHr1tpGx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dX47pp6N1kFMXQkOQn8hUd6L0alawbDNcXiMH+vHmgaY+iWFk6b e9jGTEDQojWW+hCidvV93nYTNvj530fL/7wFR89fsleK1WFtHenjtYOGBnSd51jStjCACoP D0XXKulJ3Nk4cOYuDb+MYWd9VFf98uc1IuWiwbh588VsLWUZLtmQ2epsJGSh1LpFMwA/38b vCHD1fhYpAd3+GOSM1pgw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:UpfOGr5ZjNE=:ZlW2wK3sI2APho3ekE/LHP AqR0Cgj4wG4/Fb98KYlR0B2V2ZZWMxRVfpuk/vi+FW931YbeEB0c56VVHUl1Yk7rCdHjHwKe6 PJtYqfjk9iKKuJNWUODRINWZMkLT74Cht8EAaSuZnW6x41X4P375mhdZ7gT5ujpCOSWq957GL PCuIjda9ISX3oYSCgv6jDe4dOncpKytOVUnwhAH+6CSIbBy1gmJD/whC8dIo+KbHuP6cXiFFv Q1Jin3KVydwMj6/0UjIiQgZBKlFtvW0boVLQZi+1tK3os5GZ9QROnlp4o4LlQ0aoUToPhPRqr uFSZxVwFE5e+bEYIbok74HNHYb7bIJbYEQfTmxpnj40rWdlFgcMut/1o1iLbOr0FQJVjFBwz9 qMf8X2VT/xe17NcoH9ndP+vSjFsndwsTc/DjGFoeH+ZPkDilF7pALyXCbOCoR6ey7kjBMUBGh yAo2T18ykAuT8e1raxxELqppBot+mLNgt8B+IcADLQXwbaSgRl+WFRtqsI/e4VPlCGHkD8coP jXNYYINin0F2xEtdLSxpIoRRxhePC4/TW2CuBkrquVAXv79aUmrz4Ez2WRpmK0mliJ1RaMjpC ujTxmswFfbLxCoazdLZ9n/Y9kuU+sfQ7jsira9XbZYap01Hr69DYDmXPw2W+Nb+gMex6KkLfw wNnM3YtthEpamAsUg75gMWyUar2p1rNHFPmMr7TvAggv77n7OV080pZDnBKCTjVfspOE8KSSq dt5tOyLT9I779pgjiZJdcJyAqBzBJ36LPU0/QYodq5pK/dkcG/jD8iH17JMiRtvM0ltMulfPQ ywCvdjl8+PFZrgCuCNS4TMdxqI6a7DbhX7CtrVzyO4Jkw9aoeU5ZVEroWdnZayAiCEKSbNgEj wnpmHVk3wmVjuclDgCww== X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree , Benjamin Fair , Avi Fishman , Patrick Venture , OpenBMC Maillist , Jonathan =?utf-8?Q?Neusch=C3=A4fer?= , Tali Perry , Rob Herring , Linux Kernel Mailing List Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --jauI0NPFqHr1tpGx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:21:36PM +0200, Tomer Maimon wrote: > Hi Jonathan, >=20 > Thanks a lot for sending the patch, >=20 > I think that when it related to the SoC EVB it can stay with the > genral compatible name nuvoton,npcm750 >=20 > you can see it also in, > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-as= t2500-evb.dts#L8 To make the single compatible string match the DT binding, I'll have to write the binding a little differently. I wrote it like this: compatible: oneOf: - description: NPCM750 based boards items: - enum: - nuvoton,npcm750-evb # NPCM750 evaluation board - const: nuvoton,npcm750 I guess I could do something like this: compatible: oneOf: - description: NPCM750 development board const: nuvoton,npcm750 And later add this part, when needed: - description: NPCM750 based boards items: - enum: - vendor,foo-bar-bmc - const: nuvoton,npcm750 What do you think? Thanks, Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 17:47, Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer > wrote: [...] > > / { > > model =3D "Nuvoton npcm750 Development Board (Device Tree)"; > > - compatible =3D "nuvoton,npcm750"; > > + compatible =3D "nuvoton,npcm750-evb", "nuvoton,npcm750"; --jauI0NPFqHr1tpGx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEvHAHGBBjQPVy+qvDCDBEmo7zX9sFAmBA/8UACgkQCDBEmo7z X9uThA//c7olZ+Kqwd7U6t2kYlBKyTffPaezxpMzoBRm279l3m6K766RRCLYoeQL wnAM/m6lvU3OXGiQwGxGyruFjDWxXo5p8UNFW+dI3JLzpkty7Jl7gu/EH7e/nWad ftV4REogYqABKD8WL6LXk9cEf/8nnyVJX2PAlNjcNIGRcYusQ66Y75gQRm6JtBjN QTImrmP1FySoS/Gea8CmKfFWYjSpccMYgG7aObHc+7SbtArJ6inBT15kbKba53k5 F047NDjZslQk/h+j0JxDWwef70KwtDT2S63DdJfTHUbW52Z6xuwd0xfSMk1rTun1 Gg1oBiQLXg5554IYB9d773X03uOeGJasT4et33obA0vdaDsYd6AAHcSMX80rZaiZ fyRbFRjHM08Q6XZ+VayvUkxkN6of5ZpM+wBlGAPHJuAyXGfbCoHnHRLJd1c2XXjT C5duUdTEF2pWGyBc/C4UrnTy8AUKenPDy4Zm0ZA2m6OvX1LQ2WF9pwynnDb1OZaT a3HsfNDyMoU1I41MRs1QsXdiUOplX78PDS008incEHgryOdw/3g0JEYeMls442oU pbleWoWzObbrroZ/fU0qe08zvY/ZG4XJcys+CIkpElyx3uDQhKzlpP6Z8RHprPyh KXqF0RRUZtbvNeoS1sstiw+LGbDjRrdzdQ8gAHxRxiZNSuil66I= =l5TV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jauI0NPFqHr1tpGx--