From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=M/wZ=JE=lists.ozlabs.org=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID,
	DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340BCC433ED
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  7 Apr 2021 17:56:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE166128A
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  7 Apr 2021 17:56:03 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2DE166128A
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bewilderbeest.net
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFsWj2mBVz3bmY
	for <openbmc@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2021 03:56:01 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bewilderbeest.net header.i=@bewilderbeest.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=thorn header.b=aHsyeYi8;
	dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=bewilderbeest.net (client-ip=71.19.156.171;
 helo=thorn.bewilderbeest.net; envelope-from=zev@bewilderbeest.net;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=bewilderbeest.net header.i=@bewilderbeest.net
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=thorn header.b=aHsyeYi8; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from thorn.bewilderbeest.net (thorn.bewilderbeest.net
 [71.19.156.171])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FFsWC580nz2y08;
 Thu,  8 Apr 2021 03:55:35 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from hatter.bewilderbeest.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:6c44:7f:ba20::7c6])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zev)
 by thorn.bewilderbeest.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEAF986;
 Wed,  7 Apr 2021 10:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bewilderbeest.net;
 s=thorn; t=1617818132;
 bh=cSbxWi5s2qegCXpYeUsESGzQY5rhhAwAJw3tA8Mb22M=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=aHsyeYi8mUAuUSz9Ms8EjG0Mxpa2taDnyTe+z8PVOhzsZ/8p1CQcsCjGAJ9++XvQs
 iee6oJOk9FVHZzjfomi3yGxBceaNHMdSYnQIrm3r3pd7JTR6E8kt5pQjvk/W7zXAie
 wOqwzMPpW/VMxEpAp563swJpCA3up06pGRopK/Mk=
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:55:29 -0500
From: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: deprecate
 aspeed,sirq-polarity-sense
Message-ID: <YG3yEeIRKgTjnDxz@hatter.bewilderbeest.net>
References: <20210402182724.20848-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
 <20210402182724.20848-2-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
 <YG3NR4bGRjIGZhgx@kroah.com>
 <YG3kJC+6gLC6RzzQ@hatter.bewilderbeest.net>
 <YG3q9brKTC4pkQbs@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YG3q9brKTC4pkQbs@kroah.com>
X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC <openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/openbmc>,
 <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/>
List-Post: <mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/openbmc>,
 <mailto:openbmc-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: - <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "openbmc"
 <openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:25:09PM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:56:04AM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:18:31AM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:27:21PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> > > This property ties SIRQ polarity to SCU register bits that don't
>> > > necessarily have any direct relationship to it; the only use of it
>> > > was removed in commit c82bf6e133d30e0f9172a20807814fa28aef0f67.
>> >
>> > Please write that as:
>> > 	c82bf6e133d3 ("ARM: aspeed: g5: Do not set sirq polarity")
>> >
>>
>> Ack, will do.
>>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>> > > ---
>> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 1 +
>> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > What changed from previous versions?  That always goes below the ---
>> > line.
>> >
>>
>> I included an overview of that in the cover letter (https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/20210402182724.20848-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net/);
>> is it desirable to also have that duplicated in the individual patches in
>> the series?
>
>Any reason why you didn't include all of the relevant people and mailing
>lists in that cover letter?  I've never seen it before :)
>

Ah -- is there a good rule of thumb (or git send-email trick) for that?  
Set-union of get_maintainer.pl over all the patches in the series?  


Zev