From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC90C4338F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 23:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748586103B for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 23:10:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 748586103B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GgkqW6rWCz3ckr for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:10:47 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Pq8JnAHT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=Pq8JnAHT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GgSLN4VRLz302N; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:18:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0D8760F02; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:17:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1628165880; bh=SnZyEDwSCGcMILVNay8kJLylO4dxnvZ30uP6PD40vys=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Pq8JnAHT0Nj6CCvb6OWE7mZTidN+sS03OJueS/j2ORg4/13bAzKPlhFvdYox8K1SK g/+gUCNoRLLQAHIjX195xj/llPbClQTbV+ewbEh9g0Es0c4wcBuQwf5mJoTVnGOlRo 7LKvcavL2oHs7S6k6KFfEgkyqHxJlloXQK7G36mM= Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 14:17:57 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Iwona Winiarska Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce PECI subsystem Message-ID: References: <20210803113134.2262882-1-iwona.winiarska@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210803113134.2262882-1-iwona.winiarska@intel.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:10:24 +1000 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Zev Weiss , Jae Hyun Yoo , Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Corbet , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , Ingo Molnar , Guenter Roeck , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Andrew Jeffery , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam , Olof Johansson Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:31:19PM +0200, Iwona Winiarska wrote: > Hi Greg, > > This is a second round of patches introducing PECI subsystem. > I don't think it is ready to be applied right away (we're still > missing r-b's), but I hope we have chance to complete discussion in > the 5.15 development cycle. I would appreciate if you could take > a look. I will wait to review this when you all feel it is ready so as to not waste my time finding things that you already know need to be resolved. thanks, greg k-h