openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:07:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c37eeb656151831123ec53bfc4e3c6caf718a060.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6331cdbababea893bcde5f8ca9529dd89dafd67.camel@kernel.crashing.org>

On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 11:48 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > We've generally standardized around "label" for things like slots,
> > ports, connectors, etc. that need to be physically identified.
> 
> Yes, label would be an option too, probably a better one that aliases.
> 
> > "slot-names" it seems hasn't gotten used for FDT. Since there aren't
> > DT's published for OF based systems nor any documentation, newbies
> > like me (that only have 8 years of DT experience) don't have any
> > insight into how things used to be done.
> 
> In a pretty much ad-hoc way :-) In this case, though, chip-id is a
> simple solution and works well (and I have the code already written and
> tested :-)

I want to try to get that stuff upstream. Do you still object to the
chip-id's after our discussion ? The labels aren't that great really...

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-12  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-22  4:37 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-22  4:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsi: Add support for device-tree provided chip IDs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-03 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs Rob Herring
2018-07-04  1:06   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-05 18:49     ` Rob Herring
2018-07-06  1:48       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-12  2:07         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2018-07-16 14:13           ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c37eeb656151831123ec53bfc4e3c6caf718a060.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).