New IPMI spec (Was: IPMI Adopter's agreement)

[Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1088 bytes --]

James, do you by any chance know if there is any work in progress on a newer IPMI specification or is it a deprecated standard and will not be updated? I'm asking mostly because of https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3417

Thank you.
Alexander.

20.11.2018 20:42, James Mihm wrote:
> I've refreshed my question internally, and expect to get a response next week.
> The person is out of the office until next week.
>
> James.On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:35 AM Alexander Amelkin
> <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>> Any further info on this?
>>
>> 26.06.2018 21:49, James Mihm wrote:
>>> I'm looking into how we need to proceed regarding this question
>>> internally here at Intel.
>>>
>>> James.
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> wrote:
>>>> Just wondering, does OpenBMC / TLF have this fine document signed?
>>>>
>>>> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/ipmi/ipmi-home.html/#adopters
>>>>
>>>> Or does each vendor need to sign this separately?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Alexander.
>>>>
>>>>
>>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]