openrisc.lists.librecores.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 2/5] asm-generic: ticket-lock: New generic ticket-based spinlock
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 21:57:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjM+P32I4fENIqGV@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220316232600.20419-3-palmer@rivosinc.com>

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:25:57PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> This is a simple, fair spinlock.  Specifically it doesn't have all the
> subtle memory model dependencies that qspinlock has, which makes it more
> suitable for simple systems as it is more likely to be correct.
> 
> [Palmer: commit text]
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> --
> 
> I have specifically not included Peter's SOB on this, as he sent his
> original patch
> <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/>
> without one.
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h | 11 ++++
>  include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h       | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..829759aedda8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +typedef atomic_t arch_spinlock_t;
> +
> +#define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED	ATOMIC_INIT(0)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3f0d53e21a37
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +/*
> + * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
> + *
> + * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
> + * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
> + * to a test-and-set lock.
> + *
> + * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
> + * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
> + * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
> + * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
> + * a test-and-set.
> + *
> + * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
> + * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is SC to create an RCsc lock.
> + *

Probably it's better to use "fully-ordered" instead of "SC", because our
atomic documents never use "SC" or "Sequential Consisteny" to describe
the semantics, further I'm not sure our "fully-ordered" is equivalent to
SC, better not cause misunderstanding in the future here.

> + * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
> + * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
> + * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H
> +
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock-types.h>
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, lock); /* SC, gives us RCsc */
> +	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
> +
> +	if (ticket == (u16)val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	atomic_cond_read_acquire(lock, ticket == (u16)VAL);

If you want to make the lock RCsc, you will also need to make the above
atomic_cond_read_acquire() a RCsc acquire, now it's only RCpc.

Regards,
Boqun

> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool ticket_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 old = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + __is_defined(__BIG_ENDIAN);
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	return ((val >> 16) != (val & 0xffff));
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> +{
> +	return !ticket_is_locked(&lock);
> +}
> +
> +#define arch_spin_lock(l)		ticket_lock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_trylock(l)		ticket_trylock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_unlock(l)		ticket_unlock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_is_locked(l)		ticket_is_locked(l)
> +#define arch_spin_is_contended(l)	ticket_is_contended(l)
> +#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)	ticket_value_unlocked(l)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H */
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-16 23:25 [OpenRISC] [PATCH 0/5] Generic Ticket Spinlocks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 1/5] asm-generic: qspinlock: Indicate the use of mixed-size atomics Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17 17:46   ` Waiman Long
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 2/5] asm-generic: ticket-lock: New generic ticket-based spinlock Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17  9:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 13:57   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2022-03-17 15:03     ` Waiman Long
2022-03-17 15:34       ` Boqun Feng
2022-03-17 18:04   ` Waiman Long
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 3/5] openrisc: Move to ticket-spinlock Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17  9:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-21 21:29   ` Stafford Horne
2022-03-22  3:29     ` Guo Ren
2022-03-22  4:10       ` Stafford Horne
2022-03-22  6:45         ` Guo Ren
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 4/5] RISC-V: Move to ticket-spinlocks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-16 23:26 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Move to queued RW locks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17  9:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17  9:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 0/5] Generic Ticket Spinlocks Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-17 11:09 ` Heiko =?unknown-8bit?q?St=C3=BCbner?=
2022-03-18  7:24   ` Guo Ren
2022-03-18  8:40 ` Guo Ren
2022-03-22 18:18 ` Conor Dooley
2022-03-22 20:02   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-22 20:19     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjM+P32I4fENIqGV@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).