[v5,00/13] x86: Enable FSGSBASE instructions
mbox series

Message ID 20190201205319.15995-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Headers show
Series
  • x86: Enable FSGSBASE instructions
Related show

Message

Bae, Chang Seok Feb. 1, 2019, 8:53 p.m. UTC
update from v4 [4]:
* Remove the FSGSBASE assembly macros

Update from v3 [3]:
* Raise minimum binutils requirement to use the new instructions directly
* Optimize FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro
* Rename some helper functions, __{rd,wr}gsbase_inactive()
* Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL instead of __kprobes
* Rebase on top of the helper function fix [6]

Update from v2 [2]:
* Separate out the preparatory patches [5] (merged as of now)
* Bisect the paranoid_entry update patch
* Edit minor nits

Updates from v1 [1]:
* Update the GSBASE update mechanism on the paranoid entry/exit.
* Exclude ptracer backward compatibility patches.
* Include FSGSBASE documentation and enumerating capability
for user space
* Add the TAINT_INSECURE flag.

[1] Version 1: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/934843
[2] Version 2: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/912063
[3] Version 3: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1002725
[4] Version 4: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1032799
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/988180
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1017513

Andi Kleen (3):
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics for FSGSBASE instructions
  x86/elf: Enumerate kernel FSGSBASE capability in AT_HWCAP2
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Add documentation for FSGSBASE

Andy Lutomirski (4):
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Preserve FS/GS state in __switch_to() if FSGSBASE is
    on
  selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test WRGSBASE
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE by default and add a chicken bit

Chang S. Bae (6):
  taint: Introduce a new taint flag (insecure)
  kbuild: Raise the minimum required binutils version to 2.21
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE instructions in the helper functions
  x86/fsgsbase/64: When copying a thread, use the FSGSBASE instructions
    if available
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro
  x86/fsgsbase/64: Use the per-CPU base as GSBASE at the paranoid_entry

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   2 +
 Documentation/process/changes.rst             |   6 +-
 Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt               |   1 +
 Documentation/x86/fsgs.txt                    | 104 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S                     |  71 +++++++++---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fsgsbase.h               | 100 ++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h                   |  15 +++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hwcap2.h            |   3 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                  |  22 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c                  | 108 ++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/kernel.h                        |   3 +-
 kernel/panic.c                                |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c        | 102 ++++++++++++++++-
 13 files changed, 497 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/fsgs.txt

--
2.19.1

Comments

Andi Kleen Feb. 1, 2019, 11:02 p.m. UTC | #1
Patches all look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

-Andi
Andy Lutomirski Feb. 2, 2019, 2:43 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi hpa-

A while back, you were working on some patches to make modify_ldt()
play better with this series.  What happened to them?

--Andy
H. Peter Anvin Feb. 5, 2019, 6:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On February 1, 2019 6:43:25 PM PST, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>Hi hpa-
>
>A while back, you were working on some patches to make modify_ldt()
>play better with this series.  What happened to them?
>
>--Andy

Looks like I need to dig them out...