From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
To: stefan.wahren@i2se.com, eric@anholt.net, dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.org
Cc: nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 04/18] stagning: vchiq_arm: use list_for_each_entry when accessing bulk_waiter_list
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:47:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026134813.7775-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026134813.7775-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
The resulting code is way more readeable and intuitive compared to plain
list_for_each.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
---
.../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 52 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
index d88dd7415e1e..5f55c708ade8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
@@ -280,16 +280,11 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_shutdown(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
"%s(%p): returning %d", __func__, instance, status);
if (status == VCHIQ_SUCCESS) {
- struct list_head *pos, *next;
+ struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter, *next;
- list_for_each_safe(pos, next,
- &instance->bulk_waiter_list) {
- struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter;
-
- waiter = list_entry(pos,
- struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list);
- list_del(pos);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(waiter, next,
+ &instance->bulk_waiter_list, list) {
+ list_del(&waiter->list);
vchiq_log_info(vchiq_arm_log_level,
"bulk_waiter - cleaned up %pK for pid %d",
waiter, waiter->pid);
@@ -473,7 +468,6 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(VCHIQ_SERVICE_HANDLE_T handle, void *data,
VCHIQ_SERVICE_T *service;
VCHIQ_STATUS_T status;
struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter = NULL;
- struct list_head *pos;
service = find_service_by_handle(handle);
if (!service)
@@ -484,13 +478,9 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(VCHIQ_SERVICE_HANDLE_T handle, void *data,
unlock_service(service);
mutex_lock(&instance->bulk_waiter_list_mutex);
- list_for_each(pos, &instance->bulk_waiter_list) {
- if (list_entry(pos, struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list)->pid == current->pid) {
- waiter = list_entry(pos,
- struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list);
- list_del(pos);
+ list_for_each_entry(waiter, &instance->bulk_waiter_list, list) {
+ if (waiter->pid == current->pid) {
+ list_del(&waiter->list);
break;
}
}
@@ -1135,21 +1125,16 @@ vchiq_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
+
args.userdata = &waiter->bulk_waiter;
} else if (args.mode == VCHIQ_BULK_MODE_WAITING) {
- struct list_head *pos;
-
mutex_lock(&instance->bulk_waiter_list_mutex);
- list_for_each(pos, &instance->bulk_waiter_list) {
- if (list_entry(pos, struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list)->pid == current->pid) {
- waiter = list_entry(pos,
- struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list);
- list_del(pos);
+ list_for_each_entry(waiter, &instance->bulk_waiter_list,
+ list) {
+ if (waiter->pid == current->pid) {
+ list_del(&waiter->list);
break;
}
-
}
mutex_unlock(&instance->bulk_waiter_list_mutex);
if (!waiter) {
@@ -2158,16 +2143,11 @@ vchiq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
vchiq_release_internal(instance->state, NULL);
{
- struct list_head *pos, *next;
-
- list_for_each_safe(pos, next,
- &instance->bulk_waiter_list) {
- struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter;
+ struct bulk_waiter_node *waiter, *next;
- waiter = list_entry(pos,
- struct bulk_waiter_node,
- list);
- list_del(pos);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(waiter, next,
+ &instance->bulk_waiter_list, list) {
+ list_del(&waiter->list);
vchiq_log_info(vchiq_arm_log_level,
"bulk_waiter - cleaned up %pK for pid %d",
waiter, waiter->pid);
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 13:47 [PATCH RFC 00/18] staging: vchiq: remove dead code & misc fixes Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 01/18] staging: vchiq_core: rework vchiq_get_config Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 02/18] staging: vchiq_arm: rework close/remove_service IOCTLS Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:47 ` [PATCH RFC 03/18] staging: vchiq_shim: delete vchi_service_create Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:47 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne [this message]
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 05/18] staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of vchi_mh.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 06/18] staging: vchiq_arm: rework vchiq_ioc_copy_element_data Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 07/18] staging: vchiq-core: get rid of is_master distinction Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 08/18] staging: vchiq_core: remove unnecessary safety checks in vchiq_init_state Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 09/18] staging: vchiq_core: do not initialize semaphores twice Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-28 20:45 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-11-06 15:41 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-11-06 16:06 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-11-06 18:28 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 10/18] staging: vchiq_core: don't add a wmb() before remote_event_signal() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 11/18] staging: vchiq_arm: use completions instead of semaphores Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-28 21:00 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 12/18] staging: vchiq_util: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 13/18] staging: vchiq_core: " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 14/18] staging: vchiq_util: get rid of unneeded memory barriers Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 15/18] stagning: vchiq_core: fix logic redundancy in parse_open Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-28 20:58 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 16/18] staging: vchiq_arm: rework probe and init functions Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-28 21:02 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 17/18] staging: vchiq_arm: fix open/release cdev functions Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-26 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC 18/18] staging: vchiq: add more tasks to the TODO list Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2018-10-28 21:11 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181026134813.7775-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--to=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).