[tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust - tip-bot for Daniel Vacek

From: tip-bot for Daniel Vacek <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neelx@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	bp@alien8.de
Subject: [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:57:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-a786ef152cdcfebc923a67f63c7815806eefcf81@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1541437840-29293-1-git-send-email-neelx@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  a786ef152cdcfebc923a67f63c7815806eefcf81
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/a786ef152cdcfebc923a67f63c7815806eefcf81
Author:     Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:10:40 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:53:15 +0100

x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust

The threshold in tsc_read_refs() is constant which may favor slower CPUs
but may not be optimal for simple reading of reference on faster ones.

Hence make it proportional to tsc_khz when available to compensate for
this. The threshold guards against any disturbance like IRQs, NMIs, SMIs
or CPU stealing by host on guest systems so rename it accordingly and
fix comments as well.

Also on some systems there is noticeable DMI bus contention at some point
during boot keeping the readout failing (observed with about one in ~300
boots when testing). In that case retry also the second readout instead of
simply bailing out unrefined. Usually the next second the readout returns
fast just fine without any issues.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541437840-29293-1-git-send-email-neelx@redhat.com

---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index e9f777bfed40..3fae23834069 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -297,15 +297,16 @@ static int __init tsc_setup(char *str)
 
 __setup("tsc=", tsc_setup);
 
-#define MAX_RETRIES     5
-#define SMI_TRESHOLD    50000
+#define MAX_RETRIES		5
+#define TSC_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD	0x20000
 
 /*
- * Read TSC and the reference counters. Take care of SMI disturbance
+ * Read TSC and the reference counters. Take care of any disturbances
  */
 static u64 tsc_read_refs(u64 *p, int hpet)
 {
 	u64 t1, t2;
+	u64 thresh = tsc_khz ? tsc_khz >> 5 : TSC_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
@@ -315,7 +316,7 @@ static u64 tsc_read_refs(u64 *p, int hpet)
 		else
 			*p = acpi_pm_read_early();
 		t2 = get_cycles();
-		if ((t2 - t1) < SMI_TRESHOLD)
+		if ((t2 - t1) < thresh)
 			return t2;
 	}
 	return ULLONG_MAX;
@@ -703,15 +704,15 @@ static unsigned long pit_hpet_ptimer_calibrate_cpu(void)
 	 * zero. In each wait loop iteration we read the TSC and check
 	 * the delta to the previous read. We keep track of the min
 	 * and max values of that delta. The delta is mostly defined
-	 * by the IO time of the PIT access, so we can detect when a
-	 * SMI/SMM disturbance happened between the two reads. If the
+	 * by the IO time of the PIT access, so we can detect when
+	 * any disturbance happened between the two reads. If the
 	 * maximum time is significantly larger than the minimum time,
 	 * then we discard the result and have another try.
 	 *
 	 * 2) Reference counter. If available we use the HPET or the
 	 * PMTIMER as a reference to check the sanity of that value.
 	 * We use separate TSC readouts and check inside of the
-	 * reference read for a SMI/SMM disturbance. We dicard
+	 * reference read for any possible disturbance. We dicard
 	 * disturbed values here as well. We do that around the PIT
 	 * calibration delay loop as we have to wait for a certain
 	 * amount of time anyway.
@@ -744,7 +745,7 @@ static unsigned long pit_hpet_ptimer_calibrate_cpu(void)
 		if (ref1 == ref2)
 			continue;
 
-		/* Check, whether the sampling was disturbed by an SMI */
+		/* Check, whether the sampling was disturbed */
 		if (tsc1 == ULLONG_MAX || tsc2 == ULLONG_MAX)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1268,7 +1269,7 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(tsc_irqwork, tsc_refine_calibration_work);
  */
 static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	static u64 tsc_start = -1, ref_start;
+	static u64 tsc_start = ULLONG_MAX, ref_start;
 	static int hpet;
 	u64 tsc_stop, ref_stop, delta;
 	unsigned long freq;
@@ -1283,14 +1284,15 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * delayed the first time we expire. So set the workqueue
 	 * again once we know timers are working.
 	 */
-	if (tsc_start == -1) {
+	if (tsc_start == ULLONG_MAX) {
+restart:
 		/*
 		 * Only set hpet once, to avoid mixing hardware
 		 * if the hpet becomes enabled later.
 		 */
 		hpet = is_hpet_enabled();
-		schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, HZ);
 		tsc_start = tsc_read_refs(&ref_start, hpet);
+		schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, HZ);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1300,9 +1302,9 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (ref_start == ref_stop)
 		goto out;
 
-	/* Check, whether the sampling was disturbed by an SMI */
-	if (tsc_start == ULLONG_MAX || tsc_stop == ULLONG_MAX)
-		goto out;
+	/* Check, whether the sampling was disturbed */
+	if (tsc_stop == ULLONG_MAX)
+		goto restart;
 
 	delta = tsc_stop - tsc_start;
 	delta *= 1000000LL;
