From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc/8xx: Use alternative scratch registers in DTLB miss handler
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:23:54 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9550a94258520c4706aaa05ce2816ae943c6fe3d.1544519035.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1544519035.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
In preparation of handling CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, we need DTLB miss handler
to use different scratch registers than other exception handlers in
order to not jeopardise exception entry on stack DTLB misses.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
index 5f5f89e87e3a..48996a424075 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S
@@ -421,8 +421,8 @@ ITLBMissLinear:
. = 0x1200
DataStoreTLBMiss:
- mtspr SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0, r10
- mtspr SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1, r11
+ mtspr SPRN_DAR, r10
+ mtspr SPRN_M_TW, r11
mfcr r11
/* If we are faulting a kernel address, we have to use the
@@ -487,10 +487,10 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
mtspr SPRN_MD_RPN, r10 /* Update TLB entry */
/* Restore registers */
- mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
-0: mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0
- mfspr r11, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1
+0: mfspr r10, SPRN_DAR
+ mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
+ mfspr r11, SPRN_M_TW
rfi
patch_site 0b, patch__dtlbmiss_exit_1
@@ -499,8 +499,9 @@ DataStoreTLBMiss:
0: lwz r10, (dtlb_miss_counter - PAGE_OFFSET)@l(0)
addi r10, r10, 1
stw r10, (dtlb_miss_counter - PAGE_OFFSET)@l(0)
- mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0
- mfspr r11, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1
+ mfspr r10, SPRN_DAR
+ mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
+ mfspr r11, SPRN_M_TW
rfi
#endif
@@ -516,10 +517,10 @@ DTLBMissIMMR:
mtspr SPRN_MD_RPN, r10 /* Update TLB entry */
li r11, RPN_PATTERN
- mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
-0: mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0
- mfspr r11, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1
+0: mfspr r10, SPRN_DAR
+ mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
+ mfspr r11, SPRN_M_TW
rfi
patch_site 0b, patch__dtlbmiss_exit_2
@@ -534,10 +535,10 @@ DTLBMissLinear:
mtspr SPRN_MD_RPN, r10 /* Update TLB entry */
li r11, RPN_PATTERN
- mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
-0: mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0
- mfspr r11, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1
+0: mfspr r10, SPRN_DAR
+ mtspr SPRN_DAR, r11 /* Tag DAR */
+ mfspr r11, SPRN_M_TW
rfi
patch_site 0b, patch__dtlbmiss_exit_3
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c
index e38f74e9e7a4..4556c8837575 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c
@@ -161,10 +161,6 @@ static void mpc8xx_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
static void mpc8xx_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
- /* mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0 */
- unsigned int insn = PPC_INST_MFSPR | __PPC_RS(R10) |
- __PPC_SPR(SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0);
-
mpc8xx_pmu_read(event);
/* If it was the last user, stop counting to avoid useles overhead */
@@ -177,6 +173,10 @@ static void mpc8xx_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
break;
case PERF_8xx_ID_ITLB_LOAD_MISS:
if (atomic_dec_return(&itlb_miss_ref) == 0) {
+ /* mfspr r10, SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0 */
+ unsigned int insn = PPC_INST_MFSPR | __PPC_RS(R10) |
+ __PPC_SPR(SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0);
+
patch_instruction_site(&patch__itlbmiss_exit_1, insn);
#ifndef CONFIG_PIN_TLB_TEXT
patch_instruction_site(&patch__itlbmiss_exit_2, insn);
@@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ static void mpc8xx_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
break;
case PERF_8xx_ID_DTLB_LOAD_MISS:
if (atomic_dec_return(&dtlb_miss_ref) == 0) {
+ /* mfspr r10, SPRN_DAR */
+ unsigned int insn = PPC_INST_MFSPR | __PPC_RS(R10) |
+ __PPC_SPR(SPRN_DAR);
+
patch_instruction_site(&patch__dtlbmiss_exit_1, insn);
patch_instruction_site(&patch__dtlbmiss_exit_2, insn);
patch_instruction_site(&patch__dtlbmiss_exit_3, insn);
--
2.13.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 11:23 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Enable CONFIG_VMAP_STACK on the 8xx Christophe Leroy
2018-12-11 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc/32: prepare for CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Christophe Leroy
2018-12-11 11:23 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2018-12-11 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc/8xx: Enable CONFIG_VMAP_STACK Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9550a94258520c4706aaa05ce2816ae943c6fe3d.1544519035.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).