From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 05/12] perf mem: Clean up output format and sort order string
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:15:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1548256530-10065-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548256530-10065-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Now, "--phys-data" is the only option which impacts the output format
and sort order. A simple "if else" is enough to handle the option.
But there will be more options added, e.g. "--data-page-size", which
also impact the output format and sort order. The code will become too
complex to be maintained.
Divide the big printf into several small pieces. Output the specific
piece only if the related option is applied.
Divide the big sort order string into several small pieces as well.
Appends specific sort string only if the related option is applied.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
No changes since V1
tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
tools/perf/util/sort.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
index 57393e9..6048fca 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "util/mem-events.h"
#include "util/debug.h"
#include "util/symbol.h"
+#include "util/sort.h"
#define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD 0x1
#define MEM_OPERATION_STORE 0x2
@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
{
struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
struct addr_location al;
- const char *fmt;
+ const char *fmt, *field_sep;
if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
@@ -167,60 +168,45 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (al.map != NULL)
al.map->dso->hit = 1;
- if (mem->phys_addr) {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
- "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
- "%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
-
- printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->phys_addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;
+ if (field_sep) {
+ fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
} else {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
- "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
+ fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
+ symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
+ }
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->pid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->tid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->ip,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
+ if (mem->phys_addr) {
+ if (field_sep)
+ fmt = "0x%"PRIx64"%s";
+ else
+ fmt = "0x%016"PRIx64"%s";
printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ sample->phys_addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
}
+
+ if (field_sep)
+ fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+ else
+ fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->weight,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->data_src,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
+ al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
out_put:
addr_location__put(&al);
return 0;
@@ -262,10 +248,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
if (ret < 0)
goto out_delete;
+ printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
+
if (mem->phys_addr)
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
- else
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
+ printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
+
+ printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
ret = perf_session__process_events(session);
@@ -273,11 +261,30 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
perf_session__delete(session);
return ret;
}
+static char *get_sort_order(struct perf_mem *mem)
+{
+ char sort[MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR];
+
+ /*
+ * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
+ * the column
+ */
+ if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE)
+ strcpy(sort, "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
+ else
+ strcpy(sort, default_mem_sort_order);
+
+ if (mem->phys_addr)
+ strcat(sort, ",phys_daddr");
+
+ return strdup(sort);
+}
static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
{
const char **rep_argv;
int ret, i = 0, j, rep_argc;
+ char *new_sort_order;
if (mem->dump_raw)
return report_raw_events(mem);
@@ -291,20 +298,9 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
rep_argv[i++] = "--mem-mode";
rep_argv[i++] = "-n"; /* display number of samples */
- /*
- * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
- * the column
- */
- if (!(mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)) {
- if (mem->phys_addr)
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
- else
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,tlb,locked";
- } else if (mem->phys_addr)
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
+ new_sort_order = get_sort_order(mem);
+ if (new_sort_order)
+ rep_argv[i++] = new_sort_order;
for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
rep_argv[i] = argv[j];
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.h b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
index ea8ff64..fc8290c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern struct sort_entry sort_srcline;
extern enum sort_type sort__first_dimension;
extern const char default_mem_sort_order[];
+#define MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR 128
+
struct he_stat {
u64 period;
u64 period_sys;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 15:15 [PATCH V2 01/12] perf/core, x86: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 02/12] perf tools: Support new sample type for data page size kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 03/12] perf script: Support " kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 04/12] perf sort: Add sort option for " kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` kan.liang [this message]
2019-01-28 15:09 ` [PATCH V2 05/12] perf mem: Clean up output format and sort order string Jiri Olsa
2019-01-28 18:41 ` Liang, Kan
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 06/12] perf mem: Support data page size kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 07/12] perf test: Add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 08/12] perf/core, x86: Add support for PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 09/12] perf tools: " kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 10/12] perf script: " kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 11/12] perf report: " kan.liang
2019-01-23 15:15 ` [PATCH V2 12/12] perf test: Add test case " kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1548256530-10065-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).