linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 12/25] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:58:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1548946743-38979-13-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548946743-38979-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

Instead disabling interrupts by setting the PSR.I bit, use a priority
higher than the one used for interrupts to mask them via PMR.

When using PMR to disable interrupts, the value of PMR will be used
instead of PSR.[DAIF] for the irqflags.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h      |  11 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
index 7ed3208..c9e9a69 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
@@ -44,6 +44,17 @@
 
 #define ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK (PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT)
 
+/*
+ * Even when Linux uses IRQ priorities for IRQ disabling, EFI does not.
+ * And EFI shouldn't really play around with priority masking as it is not aware
+ * which priorities the OS has assigned to its interrupts.
+ */
+#define arch_efi_save_flags(state_flags)		\
+	((void)((state_flags) = read_sysreg(daif)))
+
+#define arch_efi_restore_flags(state_flags)	write_sysreg(state_flags, daif)
+
+
 /* arch specific definitions used by the stub code */
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
index 24692ed..d4597b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <asm/sysreg.h>
 
 /*
  * Aarch64 has flags for masking: Debug, Asynchronous (serror), Interrupts and
@@ -36,33 +38,27 @@
 /*
  * CPU interrupt mask handling.
  */
-static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	asm volatile(
-		"mrs	%0, daif		// arch_local_irq_save\n"
-		"msr	daifset, #2"
-		: "=r" (flags)
-		:
-		: "memory");
-	return flags;
-}
-
 static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
 {
-	asm volatile(
-		"msr	daifclr, #2		// arch_local_irq_enable"
-		:
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+		"msr	daifclr, #2		// arch_local_irq_enable\n"
+		"nop",
+		"msr_s  " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ",%0\n"
+		"dsb	sy",
+		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
 		:
+		: "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
 		: "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
 {
-	asm volatile(
-		"msr	daifset, #2		// arch_local_irq_disable"
-		:
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+		"msr	daifset, #2		// arch_local_irq_disable",
+		"msr_s  " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0",
+		ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
 		:
+		: "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
 		: "memory");
 }
 
@@ -71,12 +67,44 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
  */
 static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
 {
+	unsigned long daif_bits;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	asm volatile(
-		"mrs	%0, daif		// arch_local_save_flags"
-		: "=r" (flags)
-		:
+
+	daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif);
+
+	/*
+	 * The asm is logically equivalent to:
+	 *
+	 * if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+	 *	flags = (daif_bits & PSR_I_BIT) ?
+	 *			GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF :
+	 *			read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1);
+	 * else
+	 *	flags = daif_bits;
+	 */
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+			"mov	%0, %1\n"
+			"nop\n"
+			"nop",
+			"mrs_s	%0, " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) "\n"
+			"ands	%1, %1, " __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
+			"csel	%0, %0, %2, eq",
+			ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+		: "=&r" (flags), "+r" (daif_bits)
+		: "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
 		: "memory");
+
+	return flags;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	flags = arch_local_save_flags();
+
+	arch_local_irq_disable();
+
 	return flags;
 }
 
@@ -85,16 +113,32 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
  */
 static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
 {
-	asm volatile(
-		"msr	daif, %0		// arch_local_irq_restore"
-	:
-	: "r" (flags)
-	: "memory");
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+			"msr	daif, %0\n"
+			"nop",
+			"msr_s	" __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0\n"
+			"dsb	sy",
+			ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+		: "+r" (flags)
+		:
+		: "memory");
 }
 
 static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
 {
-	return flags & PSR_I_BIT;
+	int res;
+
+	asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+			"and	%w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
+			"nop",
+			"cmp	%w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) "\n"
+			"cset	%w0, ls",
+			ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+		: "=&r" (res)
+		: "r" ((int) flags)
+		: "memory");
+
+	return res;
 }
 #endif
 #endif
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31 14:58 [PATCH v10 00/25] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 01/25] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 02/25] arm64: Remove unused daif related functions/macros Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 03/25] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 04/25] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 05/25] arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add PMR and RPR accessors Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 06/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking before calling IRQ handler Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 07/25] arm64: ptrace: Provide definitions for PMR values Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 08/25] arm64: Make PMR part of task context Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 09/25] arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 10/25] arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 11/25] efi: Let architectures decide the flags that should be saved/restored Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2019-02-08  4:35   ` [PATCH v10 12/25] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Nathan Chancellor
2019-02-08  9:36     ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-08 16:00       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-02-08 16:16       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 13/25] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 14/25] arm64: alternative: Allow alternative status checking per cpufeature Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 15/25] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 16/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 17/25] arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 18/25] arm64: gic-v3: Implement arch support for priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 19/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect if GIC can support pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 20/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Handle pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:58 ` [PATCH v10 21/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 22/25] arm64: Handle serror in NMI context Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 23/25] arm64: Skip preemption when exiting an NMI Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 24/25] arm64: Skip irqflags tracing for NMI in IRQs disabled context Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 25/25] arm64: Enable the support of pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-02-06 10:27 ` [PATCH v10 00/25] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Catalin Marinas
2019-02-07 14:21   ` Daniel Thompson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1548946743-38979-13-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).