[PATCH] drbd_receiver: mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drbd_receiver: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:28:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212212820.GA15942@embeddedor> (raw)

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c: In function ‘drbd_asb_recover_0p’:
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if (self == 1 && peer == 0) {
      ^
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3098:2: note: here
  case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
  ^~~~
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
      ^
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3123:2: note: here
  case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
  ^~~~

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Notice that in some cases, the code comment is modified in
accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index c7ad88d91a09..78bb763a367d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
 			rv =  1;
 			break;
 		}
-		/* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
+		/* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
 	case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
 		if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
 			rv = 1;
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
 		}
 		if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
 			break;
-		/* else: fall through */
+		/* Else fall through */
 	case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
 		if	(ch_self < ch_peer)
 			rv = -1;
-- 
2.20.1

