linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rhashtable: add lockdep tracking to bucket bit-spin-locks.
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:05:39 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155349033965.1111.7839703310849724597.stgit@noble.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155349021177.1111.15681654355431465791.stgit@noble.brown>

Native bit_spin_locks are not tracked by lockdep.

The bit_spin_locks used for rhashtable buckets are local
to the rhashtable implementation, so there is little opportunity
for the sort of misuse that lockdep might detect.
However locks are held while a hash function or compare
function is called, and if one of these took a lock,
a misbehaviour is possible.

As it is quite easy to add lockdep support this unlikely
possibility seems to be enough justification.

So create a lockdep class for bucket bit_spin_lock and attach
through a lockdep_map in each bucket_table.

Without the 'nested' annotation in rhashtable_rehash_one(), lockdep
correctly reports a possible problem as this lock is taken
while another bucket lock (in another table) is held.  This
confirms that the added support works.
With the correct nested annotation in place, lockdep reports
no problems.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
 include/linux/rhashtable.h |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 lib/rhashtable.c           |   15 +++++++++------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rhashtable.h b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
index 14bac26cc92c..e954d2ff5463 100644
--- a/include/linux/rhashtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct bucket_table {
 
 	struct bucket_table __rcu *future_tbl;
 
+	struct lockdep_map	dep_map;
+
 	struct rhash_head __rcu *buckets[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 };
 
@@ -88,20 +90,32 @@ struct bucket_table {
  * will have provided that.
  */
 
-static inline void rht_lock(struct rhash_head **bucket)
+static inline void rht_lock(struct bucket_table *tbl, struct rhash_head **bucket)
+{
+	local_bh_disable();
+	bit_spin_lock(1, (unsigned long *)bucket);
+	lock_map_acquire(&tbl->dep_map);
+}
+
+static inline void rht_lock_nested(struct bucket_table *tbl,
+				   struct rhash_head **bucket,
+				   unsigned int subclass)
 {
 	local_bh_disable();
 	bit_spin_lock(1, (unsigned long *)bucket);
+	lock_acquire_exclusive(&tbl->dep_map, subclass, 0, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
 }
 
-static inline void rht_unlock(struct rhash_head **bucket)
+static inline void rht_unlock(struct bucket_table *tbl, struct rhash_head **bucket)
 {
+	lock_map_release(&tbl->dep_map);
 	bit_spin_unlock(1, (unsigned long *)bucket);
 	local_bh_enable();
 }
 
-static inline void rht_unlocked(void)
+static inline void rht_unlocked(struct bucket_table *tbl)
 {
+	lock_map_release(&tbl->dep_map);
 	preempt_enable();
 	__release(bitlock);
 	local_bh_enable();
@@ -654,11 +668,11 @@ static inline void *__rhashtable_insert_fast(
 	if (!pprev)
 		goto out;
 	lock = pprev;
-	rht_lock(lock);
+	rht_lock(tbl, lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(rcu_access_pointer(tbl->future_tbl))) {
 slow_path:
-		rht_unlock(lock);
+		rht_unlock(tbl, lock);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return rhashtable_insert_slow(ht, key, obj);
 	}
@@ -728,10 +742,10 @@ static inline void *__rhashtable_insert_fast(
 		/* Assigning to *headp unlocked the chain, so we
 		 * mustn't do it again.
 		 */
-		rht_unlocked();
+		rht_unlocked(tbl);
 	} else {
 out_unlock:
-		rht_unlock(lock);
+		rht_unlock(tbl, lock);
 	}
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -937,7 +951,7 @@ static inline int __rhashtable_remove_fast_one(
 	if (!pprev)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	lock = pprev;
-	rht_lock(lock);
+	rht_lock(tbl, lock);
 
 	rht_for_each_from(he, rht_ptr(*pprev), tbl, hash) {
 		struct rhlist_head *list;
@@ -982,13 +996,13 @@ static inline int __rhashtable_remove_fast_one(
 		rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, obj);
 		if (lock == pprev) {
 			/* That rcu_assign_pointer() unlocked the chain */
-			rht_unlocked();
+			rht_unlocked(tbl);
 			goto unlocked;
 		}
 		break;
 	}
 
-	rht_unlock(lock);
+	rht_unlock(tbl, lock);
 unlocked:
 	if (err > 0) {
 		atomic_dec(&ht->nelems);
@@ -1096,7 +1110,7 @@ static inline int __rhashtable_replace_fast(
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	lock = pprev;
-	rht_lock(lock);
+	rht_lock(tbl, lock);
 
 	rht_for_each_from(he, rht_ptr(*pprev), tbl, hash) {
 		if (he != obj_old) {
@@ -1109,13 +1123,13 @@ static inline int __rhashtable_replace_fast(
 		err = 0;
 		if (pprev == lock) {
 			/* We just unlocked the chain by assigning to *pprev */
-			rht_unlocked();
+			rht_unlocked(tbl);
 			goto unlocked;
 		}
 		break;
 	}
 
-	rht_unlock(lock);
+	rht_unlock(tbl, lock);
 
 unlocked:
 	return err;
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index beb942aa1e50..db66562fc17c 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
 	struct bucket_table *tbl = NULL;
 	size_t size;
 	int i;
+	static struct lock_class_key __key;
 
 	size = sizeof(*tbl) + nbuckets * sizeof(tbl->buckets[0]);
 	tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp);
@@ -187,6 +188,8 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
 	if (tbl == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 
+	lockdep_init_map(&tbl->dep_map, "rhashtable_bucket", &__key, 0);
+
 	tbl->size = size;
 
 	rcu_head_init(&tbl->rcu);
@@ -243,7 +246,7 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_one(struct rhashtable *ht,
 
 	new_hash = head_hashfn(ht, new_tbl, entry);
 
-	rht_lock(&new_tbl->buckets[new_hash]);
+	rht_lock_nested(new_tbl, &new_tbl->buckets[new_hash], SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
 	head = rht_ptr(rht_dereference_bucket(new_tbl->buckets[new_hash],
 					      new_tbl, new_hash));
@@ -251,7 +254,7 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_one(struct rhashtable *ht,
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(entry->next, head);
 
 	rcu_assign_pointer(new_tbl->buckets[new_hash], entry);
-	rht_unlocked();
+	rht_unlocked(new_tbl);
 
 	/* Need to preserved the bit lock. */
 	if (rht_is_locked(*pprev))
@@ -272,14 +275,14 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_chain(struct rhashtable *ht,
 
 	if (!pprev)
 		return 0;
-	rht_lock(pprev);
+	rht_lock(old_tbl, pprev);
 
 	while (!(err = rhashtable_rehash_one(ht, pprev, old_hash)))
 		;
 
 	if (err == -ENOENT)
 		err = 0;
-	rht_unlock(pprev);
+	rht_unlock(old_tbl, pprev);
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -596,7 +599,7 @@ static void *rhashtable_try_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key,
 			new_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(tbl->future_tbl, ht);
 			data = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
 		} else {
-			rht_lock(pprev);
+			rht_lock(tbl, pprev);
 			data = rhashtable_lookup_one(ht, pprev, tbl,
 						     hash, key, obj);
 			new_tbl = rhashtable_insert_one(ht, pprev, tbl,
@@ -604,7 +607,7 @@ static void *rhashtable_try_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key,
 			if (PTR_ERR(new_tbl) != -EEXIST)
 				data = ERR_CAST(new_tbl);
 
-			rht_unlock(pprev);
+			rht_unlock(tbl, pprev);
 		}
 	} while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_tbl));
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-25  5:05 [PATCH 0/4] Convert rhashtable to use bitlocks NeilBrown
2019-03-25  5:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] rhashtable: use cmpxchg() in nested_table_alloc() NeilBrown
2019-03-25  5:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2019-03-25  5:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash bucket NeilBrown
2019-03-26  5:03   ` Herbert Xu
2019-03-26 15:36     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-27  3:45       ` Herbert Xu
2019-03-26 22:35     ` NeilBrown
2019-03-27  3:45       ` Herbert Xu
2019-03-27 15:04       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26  5:27   ` Herbert Xu
2019-03-26 22:40     ` NeilBrown
2019-03-25  5:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] rhashtable: allow rht_bucket_var to return NULL NeilBrown
2019-04-01 23:07 [PATCH 0/4 v2] Convert rhashtable to use bitlocks NeilBrown
2019-04-01 23:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] rhashtable: add lockdep tracking to bucket bit-spin-locks NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155349033965.1111.7839703310849724597.stgit@noble.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).