linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Xiaoyao Li " <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"Michael Chan" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 08/20] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection on Icelake mobile processor
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2019 14:21:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554326526-172295-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554326526-172295-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

Icelake mobile processor can detect split lock operations although
the processor doesn't have MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY and split lock
detection bit in the MSR. Set split lock detection feature bit
X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT on the processor based on its
family/model/stepping.

A few other processors may also have the feature but don't have
MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY. The feature will be enumerated on those
processors once their family/model/stepping information is released.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index ad3f72d106fc..7f6943af35dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -1038,8 +1038,18 @@ void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	u64 ia32_core_cap = 0;
 
-	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITY))
+	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITY)) {
+		/*
+		 * The following processors have split lock detection feature.
+		 * But since they don't have MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY, the
+		 * feature cannot be enumerated by the MSR. So enumerate the
+		 * feature by family/model/stepping.
+		 */
+		if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_MOBILE)
+			set_split_lock_detect();
+
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY exists, enumerate features that are
-- 
2.19.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03 21:21 [PATCH v6 00/20] x86/split_lock: Enable split locked accesses detection Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] x86/common: Align cpu_caps_cleared and cpu_caps_set to unsigned long Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 14:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 15:54     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] drivers/net/b44: Align pwol_mask to unsigned long for better performance Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] wlcore: simplify/fix/optimize reg_ch_conf_pending operations Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] x86/split_lock: Align x86_capability to unsigned long to avoid split locked access Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 14:44   ` David Laight
2019-04-04 16:24     ` David Laight
2019-04-04 16:35       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-04 16:52       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-04 17:29         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-04 18:11           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05  9:23         ` David Laight
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] x86/msr-index: Define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY and split lock detection bit Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection by MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] x86/split_lock: Define MSR_TEST_CTL register Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 17:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-04 22:49     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] kvm/x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY Fenghua Yu
2019-04-05 12:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-09  6:03     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] kvm/vmx: Emulate MSR TEST_CTL Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 14:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-08  8:54     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-05 12:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08  9:54     ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-08 17:48       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-10  5:03         ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-04-03 21:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by default Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 18:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-04 18:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-04 19:23     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 19:44       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10  0:02     ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-10  6:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-10 12:35         ` Fenghua Yu
2019-04-10  8:50       ` David Laight
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to enable/disable split lock detection during run time Fenghua Yu
2019-04-04 19:11   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] x86/split_lock: Document the new sysfs file for split lock detection Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] x86/clearcpuid: Support multiple clearcpuid options Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] x86/clearcpuid: Support feature flag string in kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] x86/clearcpuid: Apply cleared feature bits that are forced set before Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] x86/clearcpuid: Clear CPUID bit in CPUID faulting Fenghua Yu
2019-04-03 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] x86/clearcpuid: Change document for kernel option clearcpuid Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1554326526-172295-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).