From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] s390: avoid __builtin_return_address(n) on clang
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:26:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408212648.2407234-10-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408212648.2407234-1-arnd@arndb.de>
llvm on s390 has problems with __builtin_return_address(n), with n>0,
this results in a somewhat cryptic error message:
fatal error: error in backend: Unsupported stack frame traversal count
To work around it, use the direct return address directly. This
is probably not ideal here, but gets things to compile and should
only lead to inferior reporting, not to misbehavior of the generated
code.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41424
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 5a3c95b11952..7923c63946fb 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -13,7 +13,12 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+/* https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41424 */
+#define ftrace_return_address(n) __builtin_return_address(0)
+#else
#define ftrace_return_address(n) __builtin_return_address(n)
+#endif
void _mcount(void);
void ftrace_caller(void);
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 21:26 [PATCH 01/12] s390: remove -fno-strength-reduce flag Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] s390: don't build vdso32 with clang Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 15:57 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-10 16:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-10 19:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] s390: purgatory: pass --target option to clang Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 22:03 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-09 6:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-09 16:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-09 18:11 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] s390: qeth: address type mismatch warning Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 22:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-09 6:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 15:58 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] s390: zcrypt: initialize variables before_use Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 22:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-09 9:54 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-04-09 10:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 15:59 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-10 18:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-11 7:40 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] s390: ctcm: fix ctcm_new_device error return code Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 22:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-10 16:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] s390: cio: fix cio_irb declaration Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-08 22:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-04-09 13:13 ` Sebastian Ott
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] s390: syscall_wrapper: avoid clang warning Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 16:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] s390: make __load_psw_mask work with clang Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 16:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-04-10 16:03 ` [PATCH 10/12] s390: avoid __builtin_return_address(n) on clang Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-10 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-10 19:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-11 7:32 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] s390: make chkbss work with clang Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 16:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-08 21:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] [PROBABLY WRONG] s390: void '0' constraint in inline assembly Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 13:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-10 16:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-10 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-10 15:57 ` [PATCH 01/12] s390: remove -fno-strength-reduce flag Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408212648.2407234-10-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).