From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 20:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507183804.5512-8-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507183804.5512-1-david@redhat.com>
We really don't want anything during memory hotunplug to fail.
We always pass a valid memory block device, that check can go. Avoid
allocating memory and eventually failing. As we are always called under
lock, we can use a static piece of memory. This avoids having to put
the structure onto the stack, having to guess about the stack size
of callers.
Patch inspired by a patch from Oscar Salvador.
In the future, there might be no need to iterate over nodes at all.
mem->nid should tell us exactly what to remove. Memory block devices
with mixed nodes (added during boot) should properly fenced off and never
removed.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
drivers/base/node.c | 18 +++++-------------
include/linux/node.h | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 04fdfa99b8bc..9be88fd05147 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -803,20 +803,14 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg)
/*
* Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans.
+ * Has to be called with mem_sysfs_mutex held (due to unlinked_nodes).
*/
-int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
+void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
{
- NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
+ static nodemask_t unlinked_nodes;
- if (!mem_blk) {
- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
- return -EFAULT;
- }
- if (!unlinked_nodes)
- return -ENOMEM;
- nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
-
+ nodes_clear(unlinked_nodes);
sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr);
sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr);
for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
@@ -827,15 +821,13 @@ int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
continue;
if (!node_online(nid))
continue;
- if (node_test_and_set(nid, *unlinked_nodes))
+ if (node_test_and_set(nid, unlinked_nodes))
continue;
sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj,
kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj));
sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj));
}
- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
- return 0;
}
int link_mem_sections(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
index 02a29e71b175..548c226966a2 100644
--- a/include/linux/node.h
+++ b/include/linux/node.h
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
void *arg);
-extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk);
+extern void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk);
extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid,
unsigned int cpu_nid,
@@ -175,9 +175,8 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
{
return 0;
}
-static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
+static inline void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
{
- return 0;
}
static inline void register_hugetlbfs_with_node(node_registration_func_t reg,
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190507183804.5512-1-david@redhat.com>
2019-05-07 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify and fix check_hotplug_memory_range() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-09 12:23 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-07 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] s390x/mm: Implement arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:46 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 20:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:57 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Create memory block devices after arch_add_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:17 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 12:43 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 13:55 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 14:31 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 14:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 21:50 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 22:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop MHP_MEMBLOCK_API David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:25 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-08 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 23:08 ` osalvador
2019-05-09 7:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:27 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 18:38 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-05-08 0:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail Dan Williams
2019-05-08 7:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 13:50 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove "zone" parameter from sparse_remove_one_section David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 0:30 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190507183804.5512-8-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).