linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] RAS/CEC: Fix pfn insertion
Date: Thu,  9 May 2019 20:09:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190509180926.31932-4-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190509180926.31932-1-bp@alien8.de>

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

When inserting random PFNs for debugging the CEC through
(debugfs)/ras/cec/pfn, depending on the return value of pfn_set(),
multiple values get inserted per a single write.

That is because simple_attr_write() interprets a retval of 0 as
success and claims the whole input. However, pfn_set() returns the
cec_add_elem() value, which, if > 0 and smaller than the whole input
length, makes glibc continue issuing the write syscall until there's
input left:

  pfn_set
  simple_attr_write
  debugfs_attr_write
  full_proxy_write
  vfs_write
  ksys_write
  do_syscall_64
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

leading to those repeated calls.

Return 0 to fix that.

Rename u64_get() to pfn_get() while at it.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
---
 drivers/ras/cec.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ras/cec.c b/drivers/ras/cec.c
index 673f8a128397..1275907ff21c 100644
--- a/drivers/ras/cec.c
+++ b/drivers/ras/cec.c
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int u64_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+static int pfn_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 {
 	*val = *(u64 *)data;
 
@@ -369,10 +369,12 @@ static int pfn_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
 	*(u64 *)data = val;
 
-	return cec_add_elem(val);
+	cec_add_elem(val);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
-DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(pfn_ops, u64_get, pfn_set, "0x%llx\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(pfn_ops, pfn_get, pfn_set, "0x%llx\n");
 
 static int decay_interval_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
@@ -389,7 +391,7 @@ static int decay_interval_set(void *data, u64 val)
 	cec_mod_work(decay_interval);
 	return 0;
 }
-DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(decay_interval_ops, u64_get, decay_interval_set, "%lld\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(decay_interval_ops, pfn_get, decay_interval_set, "%lld\n");
 
 static int count_threshold_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
@@ -402,7 +404,7 @@ static int count_threshold_set(void *data, u64 val)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(count_threshold_ops, u64_get, count_threshold_set, "%lld\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(count_threshold_ops, pfn_get, count_threshold_set, "%lld\n");
 
 static int array_dump(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-09 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-09 18:09 [PATCH 00/11] RAS/CEC: Fixes and cleanups Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] RAS/CEC: Fix binary search function Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] RAS/CEC: Convert the timer callback to a workqueue Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] RAS/CEC: Check count_threshold unconditionally Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] RAS/CEC: Do not set decay value on error Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] RAS/CEC: Fix potential memory leak Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] RAS/CEC: Sanity-check array on every insertion Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] RAS/CEC: Rename count_threshold to action_threshold Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] RAS/CEC: Dump the different array element sections Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] RAS/CEC: Add CONFIG_RAS_CEC_DEBUG and move CEC debug features there Borislav Petkov
2019-05-09 18:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] RAS/CEC: Add copyright Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190509180926.31932-4-bp@alien8.de \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).