From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>
Cc: <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mailbox: stm32_ipcc: add spinlock to fix channels concurrent access
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1558513535-16736-1-git-send-email-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> (raw)
Add spinlock protection on IPCC register update to avoid race condition.
Without this fix, stm32_ipcc_set_bits and stm32_ipcc_clr_bits can be
called in parallel for different channels. This results in register
corruptions.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.c
index f91dfb1327c7..5c2d1e1f988b 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct stm32_ipcc {
void __iomem *reg_base;
void __iomem *reg_proc;
struct clk *clk;
+ spinlock_t lock; /* protect access to IPCC registers */
int irqs[IPCC_IRQ_NUM];
int wkp;
u32 proc_id;
@@ -58,14 +59,24 @@ struct stm32_ipcc {
u32 xmr;
};
-static inline void stm32_ipcc_set_bits(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask)
+static inline void stm32_ipcc_set_bits(spinlock_t *lock, void __iomem *reg,
+ u32 mask)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(reg) | mask, reg);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
}
-static inline void stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask)
+static inline void stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(spinlock_t *lock, void __iomem *reg,
+ u32 mask)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask, reg);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
}
static irqreturn_t stm32_ipcc_rx_irq(int irq, void *data)
@@ -92,7 +103,7 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_ipcc_rx_irq(int irq, void *data)
mbox_chan_received_data(&ipcc->controller.chans[chan], NULL);
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XSCR,
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XSCR,
RX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
@@ -121,7 +132,7 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_ipcc_tx_irq(int irq, void *data)
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: chan:%d tx\n", __func__, chan);
/* mask 'tx channel free' interrupt */
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
mbox_chan_txdone(&ipcc->controller.chans[chan], 0);
@@ -141,10 +152,12 @@ static int stm32_ipcc_send_data(struct mbox_chan *link, void *data)
dev_dbg(ipcc->controller.dev, "%s: chan:%d\n", __func__, chan);
/* set channel n occupied */
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XSCR, TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XSCR,
+ TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
/* unmask 'tx channel free' interrupt */
- stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR, TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
+ stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
+ TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
return 0;
}
@@ -163,7 +176,8 @@ static int stm32_ipcc_startup(struct mbox_chan *link)
}
/* unmask 'rx channel occupied' interrupt */
- stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR, RX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
+ stm32_ipcc_clr_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
+ RX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
return 0;
}
@@ -175,7 +189,7 @@ static void stm32_ipcc_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *link)
controller);
/* mask rx/tx interrupt */
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
RX_BIT_CHAN(chan) | TX_BIT_CHAN(chan));
clk_disable_unprepare(ipcc->clk);
@@ -208,6 +222,8 @@ static int stm32_ipcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!ipcc)
return -ENOMEM;
+ spin_lock_init(&ipcc->lock);
+
/* proc_id */
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &ipcc->proc_id)) {
dev_err(dev, "Missing st,proc-id\n");
@@ -259,9 +275,10 @@ static int stm32_ipcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* mask and enable rx/tx irq */
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XMR,
RX_BIT_MASK | TX_BIT_MASK);
- stm32_ipcc_set_bits(ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XCR, XCR_RXOIE | XCR_TXOIE);
+ stm32_ipcc_set_bits(&ipcc->lock, ipcc->reg_proc + IPCC_XCR,
+ XCR_RXOIE | XCR_TXOIE);
/* wakeup */
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "wakeup-source")) {
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 8:25 Arnaud Pouliquen [this message]
2019-05-23 6:39 ` [PATCH] mailbox: stm32_ipcc: add spinlock to fix channels concurrent access Fabien DESSENNE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1558513535-16736-1-git-send-email-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=fabien.dessenne@st.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).