linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/9] genirq/timings: Fix timings buffer inspection
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:16:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524111615.4891-3-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524111615.4891-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

It appears the index beginning computation is not correct, the current
code does:

     i = (irqts->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK) - 1

If irqts->count is equal to zero, we end up with an index equal to -1,
but that does not happen because the function checks against zero
before and returns in such case.

However, if irqts->count is a multiple of IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE, the
resulting & bit op will be zero and leads also to a -1 index.

Re-introduce the iteration loop belonging to the previous variance
code which was correct.

Fixes: bbba0e7c5cda "genirq/timings: Add array suffix computation code"
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/irq/timings.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
index 60362aca4ca4..250bb00ccd85 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/timings.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -267,6 +267,23 @@ void irq_timings_disable(void)
 #define PREDICTION_MAX		10 /* 2 ^ PREDICTION_MAX useconds */
 #define PREDICTION_BUFFER_SIZE	16 /* slots for EMAs, hardly more than 16 */
 
+/*
+ * Number of elements in the circular buffer: If it happens it was
+ * flushed before, then the number of elements could be smaller than
+ * IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE, so the count is used, otherwise the array size is
+ * used as we wrapped. The index begins from zero when we did not
+ * wrap. That could be done in a nicer way with the proper circular
+ * array structure type but with the cost of extra computation in the
+ * interrupt handler hot path. We choose efficiency.
+ */
+#define for_each_irqts(i, irqts)					\
+	for (i = irqts->count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ?			\
+		     0 : irqts->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK,		\
+		     irqts->count = min(IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE,		\
+					irqts->count);			\
+	     irqts->count > 0; irqts->count--,				\
+		     i = (i + 1) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK)
+
 struct irqt_stat {
 	u64	last_ts;
 	u64	ema_time[PREDICTION_BUFFER_SIZE];
@@ -528,11 +545,7 @@ u64 irq_timings_next_event(u64 now)
 	 * model while decrementing the counter because we consume the
 	 * data from our circular buffer.
 	 */
-
-	i = (irqts->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK) - 1;
-	irqts->count = min(IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE, irqts->count);
-
-	for (; irqts->count > 0; irqts->count--, i = (i + 1) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK) {
+	for_each_irqts(i, irqts) {
 		irq = irq_timing_decode(irqts->values[i], &ts);
 		s = idr_find(&irqt_stats, irq);
 		if (s)
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-24 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24 11:16 [PATCH V2 0/9] genirq/timings: Fixes and selftests Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] genirq/timings: Fix next event index function Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 13:51   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-24 11:16 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] genirq/timings: Optimize the period detection speed Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] genirq/timings: Use the min kernel macro Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 13:57   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-24 16:11     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] genirq/timings: Encapsulate timings push Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] genirq/timings: Encapsulate storing function Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] genirq/timings: Add selftest for circular array Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 14:00   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-24 16:00     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] genirq/timings: Add selftest for irqs circular buffer Daniel Lezcano
2019-05-24 11:16 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] genirq/timings: Add selftest for next event computation Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190524111615.4891-3-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).