From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@siemens.com>,
tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH RT 4/6] drm/i915: Dont disable interrupts independently of the lock
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 23:32:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190525033315.775106086@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190525033232.795741612@goodmis.org
4.19.37-rt20-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
The locks (timeline->lock and rq->lock) need to be taken with disabled
interrupts. This is done in __retire_engine_request() by disabling the
interrupts independently of the locks itself.
While local_irq_disable()+spin_lock() equals spin_lock_irq() on vanilla
it does not on RT. Also, it is not obvious if there is a special reason
to why the interrupts are disabled independently of the lock.
Enable/disable interrupts as part of the locking instruction.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 5c2c93cbab12..7124510b9131 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -356,9 +356,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(rq));
- local_irq_disable();
-
- spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_is_first(&rq->link, &engine->timeline.requests));
list_del_init(&rq->link);
spin_unlock(&engine->timeline.lock);
@@ -372,9 +370,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters));
atomic_dec(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters);
}
- spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-
- local_irq_enable();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
/*
* The backing object for the context is done after switching to the
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-25 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-25 3:32 [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 4.19.37-rt20-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2019-05-25 3:32 ` [PATCH RT 1/6] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Use a locallock instead local_irq_save() Steven Rostedt
2019-05-25 3:32 ` [PATCH RT 2/6] powerpc: reshuffle TIF bits Steven Rostedt
2019-05-25 3:32 ` [PATCH RT 3/6] tty/sysrq: Convert show_lock to raw_spinlock_t Steven Rostedt
2019-05-25 3:32 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-05-25 3:32 ` [PATCH RT 5/6] sched/completion: Fix a lockup in wait_for_completion() Steven Rostedt
2019-05-25 3:32 ` [PATCH RT 6/6] Linux 4.19.37-rt20-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190525033315.775106086@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.wagner@siemens.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).