From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] vsock/virtio: stop workers during the .remove()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:56:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528105623.27983-3-sgarzare@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190528105623.27983-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Before to call vdev->config->reset(vdev) we need to be sure that
no one is accessing the device, for this reason, we add new variables
in the struct virtio_vsock to stop the workers during the .remove().
This patch also add few comments before vdev->config->reset(vdev)
and vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev).
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index d3ba7747aa73..e694df10ab61 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
* must be accessed with tx_lock held.
*/
struct mutex tx_lock;
+ bool tx_run;
struct work_struct send_pkt_work;
spinlock_t send_pkt_list_lock;
@@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
* must be accessed with rx_lock held.
*/
struct mutex rx_lock;
+ bool rx_run;
int rx_buf_nr;
int rx_buf_max_nr;
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
* vqs[VSOCK_VQ_EVENT] must be accessed with event_lock held.
*/
struct mutex event_lock;
+ bool event_run;
struct virtio_vsock_event event_list[8];
u32 guest_cid;
@@ -98,6 +101,10 @@ static void virtio_transport_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+
+ if (!vsock->rx_run)
+ goto out;
+
while (!list_empty(&pkts)) {
struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
@@ -106,6 +113,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
virtio_transport_recv_pkt(pkt);
}
+out:
mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock);
}
@@ -134,6 +142,9 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+ if (!vsock->tx_run)
+ goto out;
+
vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
for (;;) {
@@ -192,6 +203,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (added)
virtqueue_kick(vq);
+out:
mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
if (restart_rx)
@@ -314,6 +326,10 @@ static void virtio_transport_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX];
mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
+ if (!vsock->tx_run)
+ goto out;
+
do {
struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
unsigned int len;
@@ -324,6 +340,8 @@ static void virtio_transport_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
added = true;
}
} while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vq));
+
+out:
mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
if (added)
@@ -352,6 +370,9 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+ if (!vsock->rx_run)
+ goto out;
+
do {
virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
for (;;) {
@@ -461,6 +482,9 @@ static void virtio_transport_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&vsock->event_lock);
+ if (!vsock->event_run)
+ goto out;
+
do {
struct virtio_vsock_event *event;
unsigned int len;
@@ -475,7 +499,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
} while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vq));
virtqueue_kick(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_EVENT]);
-
+out:
mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
}
@@ -611,12 +635,18 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
INIT_WORK(&vsock->send_pkt_work, virtio_transport_send_pkt_work);
INIT_WORK(&vsock->loopback_work, virtio_transport_loopback_work);
+ mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+ vsock->tx_run = true;
+ mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
virtio_vsock_rx_fill(vsock);
+ vsock->rx_run = true;
mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock);
mutex_lock(&vsock->event_lock);
virtio_vsock_event_fill(vsock);
+ vsock->event_run = true;
mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
the_virtio_vsock = vsock;
@@ -647,6 +677,22 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
/* Reset all connected sockets when the device disappear */
vsock_for_each_connected_socket(virtio_vsock_reset_sock);
+ /* Stop all work handlers to make sure no one is accessing the device */
+ mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+ vsock->rx_run = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+
+ mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+ vsock->tx_run = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&vsock->tx_lock);
+
+ mutex_lock(&vsock->event_lock);
+ vsock->event_run = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
+
+ /* Flush all device writes and interrupts, device will not use any
+ * more buffers.
+ */
vdev->config->reset(vdev);
mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
@@ -677,6 +723,7 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
}
spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
+ /* Delete virtqueues and flush outstanding callbacks if any */
vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
kfree(vsock);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 10:56 [PATCH 0/4] vsock/virtio: several fixes in the .probe() and .remove() Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-28 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] vsock/virtio: fix locking around 'the_virtio_vsock' Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-30 4:28 ` David Miller
2019-05-30 10:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-28 10:56 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2019-05-28 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] vsock/virtio: fix flush of works during the .remove() Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-29 3:22 ` Jason Wang
2019-05-29 10:58 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-30 9:46 ` Jason Wang
2019-05-30 10:10 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-30 11:59 ` Jason Wang
2019-05-31 8:18 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-31 9:56 ` Jason Wang
2019-06-06 8:11 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-06-13 8:57 ` Jason Wang
2019-06-27 10:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-28 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] vsock/virtio: free used buffers " Stefano Garzarella
2019-06-10 13:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] vsock/virtio: several fixes in the .probe() and .remove() Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-06-27 10:05 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190528105623.27983-3-sgarzare@redhat.com \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).