linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH 18/21] EDAC, mc: Introduce edac_mc_alloc_by_dimm() for per dimm allocation
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 08:44:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529084344.28562-19-rrichter@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190529084344.28562-1-rrichter@marvell.com>

Systems using ACPI GHES for error detection do not have exact
knowledge of the memory hierarchy. Compared to other memory controller
drivers the total size of each layer is unknown (card/module,
channel/slot, etc.). But there is the total number of dimms. So add a
function to allocate an mc device this way. The edac's driver uses
internally a dimm index already for data access.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>
---
 drivers/edac/edac_mc.c   | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/edac/edac_mc.h   | 17 ++++++--
 drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c |  7 ++--
 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index f7e6a751f309..bdeb9fd08249 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -303,10 +303,11 @@ static void _edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 	kfree(mci);
 }
 
-struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
-				   unsigned n_layers,
-				   struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
-				   unsigned sz_pvt)
+struct mem_ctl_info *__edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
+				unsigned dimm_num,
+				unsigned n_layers,
+				struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
+				unsigned sz_pvt)
 {
 	struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
 	struct edac_mc_layer *layer;
@@ -321,6 +322,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
 	bool per_rank = false;
 
 	BUG_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS || n_layers == 0);
+
 	/*
 	 * Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
 	 * in the old API emulation mode
@@ -336,6 +338,26 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
 			per_rank = true;
 	}
 
+	/* allocate dimm_num DIMMS, layer size must be zero */
+	if (dimm_num) {
+		if (dimm_num <= 0 ||
+			layers[0].size ||
+			(n_layers > 1 && layers[1].size) ||
+			(n_layers > 2 && layers[2].size)) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_MC,
+				"invalid layer data\n");
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Assume 1 csrow per dimm which also means 1 channel
+		 * per csrow.
+		 */
+		tot_dimms	= dimm_num;
+		tot_csrows	= dimm_num;
+		tot_channels	= 1;
+	}
+
 	/* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
 	 * structure.  We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
 	 * stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
@@ -422,25 +444,10 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
 		dimm->mci = mci;
 		dimm->idx = idx;
 
-		/*
-		 * Copy DIMM location and initialize it.
-		 */
-		len = sizeof(dimm->label);
-		p = dimm->label;
-		n = snprintf(p, len, "mc#%u", mc_num);
-		p += n;
-		len -= n;
-		for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++) {
-			n = snprintf(p, len, "%s#%u",
-				     edac_layer_name[layers[j].type],
-				     pos[j]);
-			p += n;
-			len -= n;
-			dimm->location[j] = pos[j];
-
-			if (len <= 0)
-				break;
-		}
+		/* unknown location */
+		dimm->location[0] = -1;
+		dimm->location[1] = -1;
+		dimm->location[2] = -1;
 
 		/* Link it to the csrows old API data */
 		chan->dimm = dimm;
@@ -462,6 +469,34 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
 			}
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Copy DIMM location and initialize it.
+		 */
+		len = sizeof(dimm->label);
+		p = dimm->label;
+		n = snprintf(p, len, "mc#%u", mc_num);
+		p += n;
+		len -= n;
+
+		if (dimm_num) {
+			n = snprintf(p, len, "dimm#%u", idx);
+			p += n;
+			len -= n;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++) {
+			n = snprintf(p, len, "%s#%u",
+				     edac_layer_name[layers[j].type],
+				     pos[j]);
+			p += n;
+			len -= n;
+			dimm->location[j] = pos[j];
+
+			if (len <= 0)
+				break;
+		}
+
 		/* Increment dimm location */
 		for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
 			pos[j]++;
@@ -480,7 +515,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
 
 	return NULL;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__edac_mc_alloc);
 
 void edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.h b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.h
index c4ddd5c1e24c..e8215847f853 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.h
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ do {									\
  * edac_mc_alloc() - Allocate and partially fill a struct &mem_ctl_info.
  *
  * @mc_num:		Memory controller number
+ * @dimm_num:		Number of DIMMs to allocate. If non-zero the
+ *			@layers' size parameter must be zero. Useful
+ *			if the MC hierarchy is unknown but the number
+ *			of DIMMs is known.
  * @n_layers:		Number of MC hierarchy layers
  * @layers:		Describes each layer as seen by the Memory Controller
  * @sz_pvt:		size of private storage needed
@@ -122,10 +126,15 @@ do {									\
  *	On success, return a pointer to struct mem_ctl_info pointer;
  *	%NULL otherwise
  */
-struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
-				   unsigned n_layers,
-				   struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
-				   unsigned sz_pvt);
+struct mem_ctl_info *__edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
+				unsigned dimm_num,
+				unsigned n_layers,
+				struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
+				unsigned sz_pvt);
+#define edac_mc_alloc(mc_num, n_layers, layers, sz_pvt) \
+	__edac_mc_alloc(mc_num, 0, n_layers, layers, sz_pvt)
+#define edac_mc_alloc_by_dimm(mc_num, dimm_num, n_layers, layers, sz_pvt) \
+	__edac_mc_alloc(mc_num, dimm_num, n_layers, layers, sz_pvt)
 
 /**
  * edac_get_owner - Return the owner's mod_name of EDAC MC
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c
index b8878ff498d1..4bac643d3404 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c
@@ -707,11 +707,12 @@ ghes_edac_register_one(int nid, struct ghes *ghes, struct device *parent)
 	struct edac_mc_layer layers[1];
 
 	layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_ALL_MEM;
-	layers[0].size = mem_info.num_per_node[nid];
+	layers[0].size = 0;
 	layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
 
-	mci = edac_mc_alloc(nid, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers,
-			sizeof(struct ghes_edac_pvt));
+	mci = edac_mc_alloc_by_dimm(nid, mem_info.num_per_node[nid],
+				ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers,
+				sizeof(struct ghes_edac_pvt));
 	if (!mci) {
 		pr_err("Can't allocate memory for EDAC data\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-29  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29  8:44 [PATCH 00/21] EDAC, mc, ghes: Fixes and updates to improve memory error reporting Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 01/21] EDAC, mc: Fix edac_mc_find() in case no device is found Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 02/21] EDAC: Fixes to use put_device() after device_add() errors Robert Richter
2019-06-11 17:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-12 17:17     ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 03/21] EDAC: Kill EDAC_DIMM_PTR() macro Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 04/21] EDAC: Kill EDAC_DIMM_OFF() macro Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 05/21] EDAC: Introduce mci_for_each_dimm() iterator Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 06/21] EDAC, mc: Cleanup _edac_mc_free() code Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 07/21] EDAC, mc: Remove per layer counters Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 08/21] EDAC, mc: Rework edac_raw_mc_handle_error() to use struct dimm_info Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 09/21] EDAC, ghes: Use standard kernel macros for page calculations Robert Richter
2019-05-29 15:13   ` James Morse
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 10/21] EDAC, ghes: Remove pvt->detail_location string Robert Richter
2019-05-29 15:13   ` James Morse
2019-06-12 18:13     ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 11/21] EDAC, ghes: Unify trace_mc_event() code with edac_mc driver Robert Richter
2019-05-29 15:12   ` James Morse
2019-06-03 13:10     ` Robert Richter
2019-06-04 17:15       ` James Morse
2019-06-13 22:23         ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 12/21] EDAC, ghes: Add support for legacy API counters Robert Richter
2019-05-29 15:13   ` James Morse
2019-06-12 18:41     ` Robert Richter
2019-06-19 17:22       ` James Morse
2019-06-20  6:55         ` Robert Richter
2019-06-26  9:33           ` James Morse
2019-06-26 10:27             ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 13/21] EDAC, ghes: Rework memory hierarchy detection Robert Richter
2019-05-29 15:06   ` James Morse
2019-05-31 13:41     ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 14/21] EDAC, ghes: Extract numa node information for each dimm Robert Richter
2019-05-29 17:51   ` James Morse
2019-06-13 20:52     ` Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 15/21] EDAC, ghes: Moving code around ghes_edac_register() Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 16/21] EDAC, ghes: Create one memory controller device per node Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 17/21] EDAC, ghes: Fill sysfs with the DMI DIMM label information Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 19/21] EDAC, ghes: Identify dimm by node, card, module and handle Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 20/21] EDAC, ghes: Enable per-layer reporting based on card/module Robert Richter
2019-05-29  8:44 ` [PATCH 21/21] EDAC, Documentation: Describe CPER module definition and DIMM ranks Robert Richter
2019-05-29 14:54 ` [PATCH 00/21] EDAC, mc, ghes: Fixes and updates to improve memory error reporting Borislav Petkov
2019-05-31 14:48   ` Robert Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190529084344.28562-19-rrichter@marvell.com \
    --to=rrichter@marvell.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).