From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, edubezval@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS - ARM
BIG LITTLE),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE),
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org (open list:TI BANDGAP AND THERMAL
DRIVER)
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:32:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625113244.18146-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625113244.18146-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Currently the function cpufreq_cooling_register() returns a cooling
device pointer which is used back as a pointer to call the function
cpufreq_cooling_unregister(). Even if it is correct, it would make
sense to not leak the structure inside a cpufreq driver and keep the
code thermal code self-encapsulate. Moreover, that forces to add an
extra variable in each driver using this function.
Instead of passing the cooling device to unregister, pass the policy.
Because the cpufreq_cooling_unregister() function uses the policy to
unregister itself. The only purpose of the cooling device pointer is
to unregister the cpu cooling device.
As there is no more need of this pointer, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 9 +++------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++------
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 12 ++++++------
.../thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 6 +++---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 ---
7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
index 7fe52fcddcf1..718c63231e66 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static bool bL_switching_enabled;
#define ACTUAL_FREQ(cluster, freq) ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq << 1 : freq)
#define VIRT_FREQ(cluster, freq) ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq >> 1 : freq)
-static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev[MAX_CLUSTERS];
static const struct cpufreq_arm_bL_ops *arm_bL_ops;
static struct clk *clk[MAX_CLUSTERS];
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table[MAX_CLUSTERS + 1];
@@ -501,10 +500,8 @@ static int bL_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct device *cpu_dev;
int cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
- if (cur_cluster < MAX_CLUSTERS) {
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(cdev[cur_cluster]);
- cdev[cur_cluster] = NULL;
- }
+ if (cur_cluster < MAX_CLUSTERS)
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
if (!cpu_dev) {
@@ -527,7 +524,7 @@ static void bL_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (cur_cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
return;
- cdev[cur_cluster] = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
}
static struct cpufreq_driver bL_cpufreq_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index aee024e42618..f07454249fbc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
- policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-
+ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+
pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
return 0;
@@ -1468,10 +1468,8 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
goto unlock;
}
- if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
- policy->cdev = NULL;
- }
+ if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);
if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index 83486775e593..007c7c6bf845 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct list_head node;
struct time_in_idle *idle_time;
+ struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
static DEFINE_IDA(cpufreq_ida);
@@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
goto remove_ida;
cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, 0);
+ cpufreq_cdev->cdev = cdev;
mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
/* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
@@ -699,18 +701,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register);
*
* This interface function unregisters the "thermal-cpufreq-%x" cooling device.
*/
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev;
bool last;
- if (!cdev)
- return;
-
- cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
-
mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
- list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
+ list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_cdev, &cpufreq_cdev_list, node) {
+ if (cpufreq_cdev->policy == policy) {
+ list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
/* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */
last = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list);
mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock);
@@ -719,7 +721,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
- thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cdev);
+ thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cpufreq_cdev->cdev);
ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id);
kfree(cpufreq_cdev->idle_time);
kfree(cpufreq_cdev);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
index bb6754a5342c..021c0948b740 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ static struct thermal_soc_data thermal_imx7d_data = {
struct imx_thermal_data {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
enum thermal_device_mode mode;
struct regmap *tempmon;
u32 c1, c2; /* See formula in imx_init_calib() */
@@ -656,6 +655,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_imx_thermal_match);
static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
{
struct device_node *np;
+ struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
int ret;
data->policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0);
@@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
np = of_get_cpu_node(data->policy->cpu, NULL);
if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
- data->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
- if (IS_ERR(data->cdev)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(data->cdev);
+ cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
+ if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
return ret;
}
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
static void imx_thermal_unregister_legacy_cooling(struct imx_thermal_data *data)
{
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
}
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ static int imx_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_disable_unprepare(data->thermal_clk);
thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cdev);
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
index b4f981daeaf2..170b70b6ec61 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct ti_thermal_data {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct thermal_zone_device *ti_thermal;
struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz;
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cool_dev;
struct ti_bandgap *bgp;
enum thermal_device_mode mode;
struct work_struct thermal_wq;
@@ -233,6 +232,7 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
{
struct ti_thermal_data *data;
struct device_node *np = bgp->dev->of_node;
+ struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
/*
* We are assuming here that if one deploys the zone
@@ -256,9 +256,9 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
}
/* Register cooling device */
- data->cool_dev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
- if (IS_ERR(data->cool_dev)) {
- int ret = PTR_ERR(data->cool_dev);
+ cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(data->policy);
+ if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
+ int ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
dev_err(bgp->dev, "Failed to register cpu cooling device %d\n",
ret);
cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
if (data) {
- cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cool_dev);
+ cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->policy);
if (data->policy)
cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
index bae54bb7c048..89f469ee4be4 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/**
* cpufreq_cooling_unregister - function to remove cpufreq cooling device.
- * @cdev: thermal cooling device pointer.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy
*/
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev);
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
static inline
-void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
+void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index a1467aa7f58b..ce13204df972 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -144,9 +144,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
/* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
void *driver_data;
-
- /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */
- struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
};
struct cpufreq_freqs {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 11:32 [PATCH V3 1/3] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro in a stub Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-25 11:32 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-06-26 2:58 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Viresh Kumar
2019-06-26 6:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 6:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-26 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-26 10:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-26 12:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-25 11:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: cpufreq_cooling_register returns an int Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-26 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625113244.18146-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).