linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: X86: Dynamically allocate user_fpu
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:26:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1563769581-20293-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563769581-20293-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

After reverting commit 240c35a3783a (kvm: x86: Use task structs fpu field
for user), struct kvm_vcpu is 19456 bytes on my server, PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER(3)
is the order at which allocations are deemed costly to service. In serveless
scenario, one host can service hundreds/thoudands firecracker/kata-container
instances, howerver, new instance will fail to launch after memory is too
fragmented to allocate kvm_vcpu struct on host, this was observed in some
cloud provider product environments.

This patch dynamically allocates user_fpu, kvm_vcpu is 15168 bytes now on my
Skylake server.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              | 13 ++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 13 ++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4f938ac..7b0a4ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	 * "guest_fpu" state here contains the guest FPU context, with the
 	 * host PRKU bits.
 	 */
-	struct fpu user_fpu;
+	struct fpu *user_fpu;
 	struct fpu *guest_fpu;
 
 	u64 xcr0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 19f69df..7eafc69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2143,12 +2143,20 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
+						     GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (!svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate kvm userspace's fpu\n");
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_partial_svm;
+	}
+
 	svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
 						     GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate vcpu's fpu\n");
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_partial_svm;
+		goto free_user_fpu;
 	}
 
 	err = kvm_vcpu_init(&svm->vcpu, kvm, id);
@@ -2211,6 +2219,8 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 	kvm_vcpu_uninit(&svm->vcpu);
 free_svm:
 	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
+free_user_fpu:
+	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
 free_partial_svm:
 	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
 out:
@@ -2241,6 +2251,7 @@ static void svm_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	__free_page(virt_to_page(svm->nested.hsave));
 	__free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->nested.msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
 	kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
+	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
 	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, svm->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
 	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index a279447..074385c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6598,6 +6598,7 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	free_loaded_vmcs(vmx->loaded_vmcs);
 	kfree(vmx->guest_msrs);
 	kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
+	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, vmx->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
 	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, vmx->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
 	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx);
 }
@@ -6613,12 +6614,20 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 	if (!vmx)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
+	vmx->vcpu.arch.user_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
+			GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (!vmx->vcpu.arch.user_fpu) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate kvm userspace's fpu\n");
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_partial_vcpu;
+	}
+
 	vmx->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(x86_fpu_cache,
 			GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!vmx->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate vcpu's fpu\n");
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_partial_vcpu;
+		goto free_user_fpu;
 	}
 
 	vmx->vpid = allocate_vpid();
@@ -6721,6 +6730,8 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 free_vcpu:
 	free_vpid(vmx->vpid);
 	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, vmx->vcpu.arch.guest_fpu);
+free_user_fpu:
+	kmem_cache_free(x86_fpu_cache, vmx->vcpu.arch.user_fpu);
 free_partial_vcpu:
 	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bdcd250..09dbc93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8272,7 +8272,7 @@ static void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	fpregs_lock();
 
-	copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(&vcpu->arch.user_fpu);
+	copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(vcpu->arch.user_fpu);
 	/* PKRU is separately restored in kvm_x86_ops->run.  */
 	__copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu->state,
 				~XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU);
@@ -8289,7 +8289,7 @@ static void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	fpregs_lock();
 
 	copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
-	copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&vcpu->arch.user_fpu.state);
+	copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&vcpu->arch.user_fpu->state);
 
 	fpregs_mark_activate();
 	fpregs_unlock();
-- 
2.7.4


      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22  4:26 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Fix fpu state crash in kvm guest Wanpeng Li
2019-07-22  4:26 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1563769581-20293-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).