linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] kprobes: move kprobe_ftrace_handler() from x86 and make it weak
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:37:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819192628.5f550074@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819192422.5ed79702@xhacker.debian>

This code could be reused. So move it from x86 to common code.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 44 --------------------------------
 kernel/kprobes.c                 | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
index c2ad0b9259ca..91ae1e3e65f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
@@ -12,50 +12,6 @@
 
 #include "common.h"
 
-/* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes -- called under preepmt disabed */
-void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
-			   struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct kprobe *p;
-	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
-
-	/* Preempt is disabled by ftrace */
-	p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)ip);
-	if (unlikely(!p) || kprobe_disabled(p))
-		return;
-
-	kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
-	if (kprobe_running()) {
-		kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
-	} else {
-		unsigned long orig_ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
-		/* Kprobe handler expects regs->ip = ip + 1 as breakpoint hit */
-		instruction_pointer_set(regs, ip + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
-
-		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
-		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
-		if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
-			/*
-			 * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->ip)
-			 * as if there is a 5byte nop
-			 */
-			instruction_pointer_set(regs,
-				(unsigned long)p->addr + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
-			if (unlikely(p->post_handler)) {
-				kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
-				p->post_handler(p, regs, 0);
-			}
-			instruction_pointer_set(regs, orig_ip);
-		}
-		/*
-		 * If pre_handler returns !0, it changes regs->ip. We have to
-		 * skip emulating post_handler.
-		 */
-		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
-	}
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
-
 int arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index f8400753a8a9..479148ee1822 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -960,6 +960,50 @@ static struct kprobe *alloc_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 #endif /* CONFIG_OPTPROBES */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
+/* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes -- called under preepmt disabed */
+void __weak kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+				  struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct kprobe *p;
+	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
+
+	/* Preempt is disabled by ftrace */
+	p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)ip);
+	if (unlikely(!p) || kprobe_disabled(p))
+		return;
+
+	kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
+	if (kprobe_running()) {
+		kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
+	} else {
+		unsigned long orig_ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
+		/* Kprobe handler expects regs->ip = ip + 1 as breakpoint hit */
+		instruction_pointer_set(regs, ip + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
+
+		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
+		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
+		if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
+			/*
+			 * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->ip)
+			 * as if there is a 5byte nop
+			 */
+			instruction_pointer_set(regs,
+				(unsigned long)p->addr + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
+			if (unlikely(p->post_handler)) {
+				kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
+				p->post_handler(p, regs, 0);
+			}
+			instruction_pointer_set(regs, orig_ip);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * If pre_handler returns !0, it changes regs->ip. We have to
+		 * skip emulating post_handler.
+		 */
+		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
+	}
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
+
 static struct ftrace_ops kprobe_ftrace_ops __read_mostly = {
 	.func = kprobe_ftrace_handler,
 	.flags = FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS | FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY,
-- 
2.23.0.rc1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19 11:35 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: KPROBES_ON_FTRACE Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] kprobes: adjust kprobe addr for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 16:43   ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-20  1:51     ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-20  0:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-08-20  2:05     ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] kprobes/x86: use instruction_pointer and instruction_pointer_set Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-20  0:09   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-08-19 11:37 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2019-08-20  0:07   ` [PATCH 3/4] kprobes: move kprobe_ftrace_handler() from x86 and make it weak Masami Hiramatsu
2019-08-20  1:56     ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: implement KPROBES_ON_FTRACE Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 16:52   ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-20  2:16     ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 12:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm64: KPROBES_ON_FTRACE Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 13:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190819192628.5f550074@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).