linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	sboyd@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.liau@actions-semi.com, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:26:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190821025629.15470-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190821025629.15470-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
helpers.

This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
error.

While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
"owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.

Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
index 317d4a9e112e..f15e2621fa18 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
@@ -64,11 +64,10 @@ static unsigned int _get_table_val(const struct clk_factor_table *table,
 	return val;
 }
 
-static int clk_val_best(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+static int owl_clk_val_best(const struct owl_factor_hw *factor_hw,
+			struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 			unsigned long *best_parent_rate)
 {
-	struct owl_factor *factor = hw_to_owl_factor(hw);
-	struct owl_factor_hw *factor_hw = &factor->factor_hw;
 	const struct clk_factor_table *clkt = factor_hw->table;
 	unsigned long parent_rate, try_parent_rate, best = 0, cur_rate;
 	unsigned long parent_rate_saved = *best_parent_rate;
@@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ long owl_factor_helper_round_rate(struct owl_clk_common *common,
 	const struct clk_factor_table *clkt = factor_hw->table;
 	unsigned int val, mul = 0, div = 1;
 
-	val = clk_val_best(&common->hw, rate, parent_rate);
+	val = owl_clk_val_best(factor_hw, &common->hw, rate, parent_rate);
 	_get_table_div_mul(clkt, val, &mul, &div);
 
 	return *parent_rate * mul / div;
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-21  2:56 [PATCH v3 0/7] Add SD/MMC driver for Actions Semi S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-21  2:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: mmc: Add Actions Semi SD/MMC/SDIO controller binding Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-27 17:19   ` Rob Herring
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add MMC controller support for S900 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add uSD and eMMC support for Bubblegum96 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mmc: Add Actions Semi Owl SoCs SD/MMC driver Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Actions Semi SD/MMC driver and binding Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-08-21  2:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: configs: Enable Actions Semi platform in defconfig Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190821025629.15470-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.liau@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).