linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: pauld@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, quentin.perret@arm.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
	hdanton@sina.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:33:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1568878421-12301-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568878421-12301-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

runnable load has been introduced to take into account the case where
blocked load biases the wake up path which may end to select an overloaded
CPU with a large number of runnable tasks instead of an underutilized
CPU with a huge blocked load.

Tha wake up path now starts to looks for idle CPUs before comparing
runnable load and it's worth aligning the wake up path with the
load_balance.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index acca869..39a37ae 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5485,7 +5485,7 @@ wake_affine_weight(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
 	s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
 	unsigned long task_load;
 
-	this_eff_load = cpu_runnable_load(cpu_rq(this_cpu));
+	this_eff_load = cpu_load(cpu_rq(this_cpu));
 
 	if (sync) {
 		unsigned long current_load = task_h_load(current);
@@ -5503,7 +5503,7 @@ wake_affine_weight(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
 		this_eff_load *= 100;
 	this_eff_load *= capacity_of(prev_cpu);
 
-	prev_eff_load = cpu_runnable_load(cpu_rq(prev_cpu));
+	prev_eff_load = cpu_load(cpu_rq(prev_cpu));
 	prev_eff_load -= task_load;
 	if (sched_feat(WA_BIAS))
 		prev_eff_load *= 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
@@ -5591,7 +5591,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
 		max_spare_cap = 0;
 
 		for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_span(group)) {
-			load = cpu_runnable_load(cpu_rq(i));
+			load = cpu_load(cpu_rq(i));
 			runnable_load += load;
 
 			avg_load += cfs_rq_load_avg(&cpu_rq(i)->cfs);
@@ -5732,7 +5732,7 @@ find_idlest_group_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			load = cpu_runnable_load(cpu_rq(i));
+			load = cpu_load(cpu_rq(i));
 			if (load < min_load) {
 				min_load = load;
 				least_loaded_cpu = i;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-19  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-19  7:33 [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: rework the CFS load balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] sched/fair: clean up asym packing Vincent Guittot
2019-09-27 23:57   ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] sched/fair: rename sum_nr_running to sum_h_nr_running Vincent Guittot
2019-09-27 23:59   ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-01 17:11   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] sched/fair: remove meaningless imbalance calculation Vincent Guittot
2019-09-28  0:05   ` Rik van Riel
2019-10-01 17:12   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-02  6:28     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-30  1:12   ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-30  7:44     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-30 16:24   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01  8:14     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 16:52       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-02  6:44         ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02  9:21           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-08 13:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-02  8:23         ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02  9:24           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01  8:15   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01  9:14     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 16:57       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-10-01 17:47   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-02  8:30     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-02 10:47       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 14:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 14:34           ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 15:30             ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 15:48               ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 18:45                 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 16:33             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 16:39               ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:36                 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-08 17:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-08 18:47     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-16  7:21   ` Parth Shah
2019-10-16 11:56     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-18  5:34       ` Parth Shah
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: use rq->nr_running when balancing load Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load in load_balance Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: evenly spread tasks when not overloaded Vincent Guittot
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] sched/fair: use utilization to select misfit task Vincent Guittot
2019-10-01 17:12   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-09-19  7:33 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2019-10-07 15:14   ` [PATCH v3 09/10] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path Rik van Riel
2019-10-07 15:27     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-07 18:06       ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-19  7:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] sched/fair: optimize find_idlest_group Vincent Guittot
2019-10-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: rework the CFS load balance Phil Auld
2019-10-08 15:53   ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-09 19:33     ` Phil Auld
2019-10-10  8:20       ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-16  7:21 ` Parth Shah
2019-10-16 11:51   ` Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1568878421-12301-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).