From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] cgroup: pids: use atomic64_t for pids->limit
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 02:50:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016155001.13651-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> (raw)
Because pids->limit can be changed concurrently (but we don't want to
take a lock because it would be needlessly expensive), use atomic64_ts
instead.
Fixes: commit 49b786ea146f ("cgroup: implement the PIDs subsystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
---
v2:
* Switch to atomic64_t instead of using {READ,WRITE}_ONCE().
v1: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191012010539.6131-1-cyphar@cyphar.com/>
kernel/cgroup/pids.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/pids.c b/kernel/cgroup/pids.c
index 8e513a573fe9..138059eb730d 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/pids.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/pids.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct pids_cgroup {
* %PIDS_MAX = (%PID_MAX_LIMIT + 1).
*/
atomic64_t counter;
- int64_t limit;
+ atomic64_t limit;
/* Handle for "pids.events" */
struct cgroup_file events_file;
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ pids_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent)
if (!pids)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- pids->limit = PIDS_MAX;
atomic64_set(&pids->counter, 0);
+ atomic64_set(&pids->limit, PIDS_MAX);
atomic64_set(&pids->events_limit, 0);
return &pids->css;
}
@@ -146,13 +146,14 @@ static int pids_try_charge(struct pids_cgroup *pids, int num)
for (p = pids; parent_pids(p); p = parent_pids(p)) {
int64_t new = atomic64_add_return(num, &p->counter);
+ int64_t limit = atomic64_read(&p->limit);
/*
* Since new is capped to the maximum number of pid_t, if
* p->limit is %PIDS_MAX then we know that this test will never
* fail.
*/
- if (new > p->limit)
+ if (new > limit)
goto revert;
}
@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@ static ssize_t pids_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
* Limit updates don't need to be mutex'd, since it isn't
* critical that any racing fork()s follow the new limit.
*/
- pids->limit = limit;
+ atomic64_set(&pids->limit, limit);
return nbytes;
}
@@ -285,7 +286,7 @@ static int pids_max_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css = seq_css(sf);
struct pids_cgroup *pids = css_pids(css);
- int64_t limit = pids->limit;
+ int64_t limit = atomic64_read(&pids->limit);
if (limit >= PIDS_MAX)
seq_printf(sf, "%s\n", PIDS_MAX_STR);
--
2.23.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-16 15:50 Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2019-10-24 19:08 ` [PATCH v2] cgroup: pids: use atomic64_t for pids->limit Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191016155001.13651-1-cyphar@cyphar.com \
--to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).