linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Martin K Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Alexis Savery <asavery@chromium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:50:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114154903.v7.2.I4d476bddbf41a61422ad51502f4361e237d60ad4@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114235008.185111-1-evgreen@chromium.org>

If the backing device for a loop device is itself a block device,
then mirror the "write zeroes" capabilities of the underlying
block device into the loop device. Copy this capability into both
max_write_zeroes_sectors and max_discard_sectors of the loop device.

The reason for this is that REQ_OP_DISCARD on a loop device translates
into blkdev_issue_zeroout(), rather than blkdev_issue_discard(). This
presents a consistent interface for loop devices (that discarded data
is zeroed), regardless of the backing device type of the loop device.
There should be no behavior change for loop devices backed by regular
files.

This change fixes blktest block/003, and removes an extraneous
error print in block/013 when testing on a loop device backed
by a block device that does not support discard.

Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
---

Changes in v7:
- Rebase on top of Darrick's patch
- Tweak opening line of commit description (Darrick)

Changes in v6: None
Changes in v5:
- Don't mirror discard if lo_encrypt_key_size is non-zero (Gwendal)

Changes in v4:
- Mirror blkdev's write_zeroes into loopdev's discard_sectors.

Changes in v3:
- Updated commit description

Changes in v2: None

 drivers/block/loop.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 6a9fe1f9fe84..e8f23e4b78f7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -427,11 +427,12 @@ static int lo_fallocate(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos,
 	 * information.
 	 */
 	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+	struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
 	int ret;
 
 	mode |= FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
 
-	if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
+	if (!blk_queue_discard(q)) {
 		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -862,6 +863,21 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
+	struct request_queue *backingq;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the backing device is a block device, mirror its zeroing
+	 * capability. REQ_OP_DISCARD translates to a zero-out even when backed
+	 * by block devices to keep consistent behavior with file-backed loop
+	 * devices.
+	 */
+	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) && !lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
+		backingq = bdev_get_queue(inode->i_bdev);
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q,
+			backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
+
+		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q,
+			backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
 
 	/*
 	 * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the
@@ -869,22 +885,24 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 	 * encryption is enabled, because it may give an attacker
 	 * useful information.
 	 */
-	if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) ||
-	    lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
+	} else if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
 		q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
 		q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
 		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
 		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
-		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
-		return;
-	}
 
-	q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
-	q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
+	} else {
+		q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
+		q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
 
-	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
+		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
+	}
+
+	if (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors)
+		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
+	else
+		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
 }
 
 static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-14 23:50 [PATCH v7 0/2] loop: Better discard for block devices Evan Green
2019-11-14 23:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly Evan Green
2019-12-02 17:05   ` Gwendal Grignou
2019-12-03  0:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-14 23:50 ` Evan Green [this message]
2019-11-20  2:25   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-20 18:56     ` Evan Green
2019-11-20 19:13       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-20 19:25         ` Evan Green
2019-11-20 19:45           ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-21 21:18             ` Evan Green
2019-11-21 21:25               ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-21 22:35                 ` Evan Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114154903.v7.2.I4d476bddbf41a61422ad51502f4361e237d60ad4@changeid \
    --to=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=asavery@chromium.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).