From: "tip-bot2 for Joel Fernandes (Google)" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: core/urgent] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:42:35 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157409895539.12247.11066584934267317219.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
The following commit has been merged into the core/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ac91dcca87e4300ea30e9514c31064d32469dd6d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ac91dcca87e4300ea30e9514c31064d32469dd6d
Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:18:42 -04:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:20:00 +01:00
workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
Because list_for_each_entry_rcu() can now check for holding a
lock as well as for being in an RCU read-side critical section,
this commit replaces the workqueue_sysfs_unregister() function's
use of assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex() and list_for_each_entry_rcu() with
list_for_each_entry_rcu() augmented with a lockdep_is_held() optional
argument.
[ Cherry-picked from: 5a6446626d7e: ("workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check") ]
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc2e09a..e501c79 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
-#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
- "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
-
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
@@ -425,9 +420,8 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
* ignored.
*/
#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
- list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \
- if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \
- else
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \
+ lockdep_is_held(&(wq->mutex)))
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157409895539.12247.11066584934267317219.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).