linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/6] vsock/virtio: remove loopback handling
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:01:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119110121.14480-7-sgarzare@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119110121.14480-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>

We can remove the loopback handling from virtio_transport,
because now the vsock core is able to handle local communication
using the new vsock_loopback device.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 61 ++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index 1458c5c8b64d..dfbaf6bd8b1c 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -44,10 +44,6 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
 	spinlock_t send_pkt_list_lock;
 	struct list_head send_pkt_list;
 
-	struct work_struct loopback_work;
-	spinlock_t loopback_list_lock; /* protects loopback_list */
-	struct list_head loopback_list;
-
 	atomic_t queued_replies;
 
 	/* The following fields are protected by rx_lock.  vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]
@@ -86,20 +82,6 @@ static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_loopback(struct virtio_vsock *vsock,
-					      struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
-{
-	int len = pkt->len;
-
-	spin_lock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&pkt->list, &vsock->loopback_list);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-
-	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->loopback_work);
-
-	return len;
-}
-
 static void
 virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
@@ -194,7 +176,8 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
 	}
 
 	if (le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid) == vsock->guest_cid) {
-		len = virtio_transport_send_pkt_loopback(vsock, pkt);
+		virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
+		len = -ENODEV;
 		goto out_rcu;
 	}
 
@@ -502,33 +485,6 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
 	.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
 };
 
-static void virtio_transport_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
-		container_of(work, struct virtio_vsock, loopback_work);
-	LIST_HEAD(pkts);
-
-	spin_lock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-	list_splice_init(&vsock->loopback_list, &pkts);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-
-	mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
-
-	if (!vsock->rx_run)
-		goto out;
-
-	while (!list_empty(&pkts)) {
-		struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
-
-		pkt = list_first_entry(&pkts, struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
-		list_del_init(&pkt->list);
-
-		virtio_transport_recv_pkt(&virtio_transport, pkt);
-	}
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock);
-}
-
 static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
@@ -633,13 +589,10 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	mutex_init(&vsock->event_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
-	spin_lock_init(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->loopback_list);
 	INIT_WORK(&vsock->rx_work, virtio_transport_rx_work);
 	INIT_WORK(&vsock->tx_work, virtio_transport_tx_work);
 	INIT_WORK(&vsock->event_work, virtio_transport_event_work);
 	INIT_WORK(&vsock->send_pkt_work, virtio_transport_send_pkt_work);
-	INIT_WORK(&vsock->loopback_work, virtio_transport_loopback_work);
 
 	mutex_lock(&vsock->tx_lock);
 	vsock->tx_run = true;
@@ -720,22 +673,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	}
 	spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-	while (!list_empty(&vsock->loopback_list)) {
-		pkt = list_first_entry(&vsock->loopback_list,
-				       struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
-		list_del(&pkt->list);
-		virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->loopback_list_lock);
-
 	/* Delete virtqueues and flush outstanding callbacks if any */
 	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
 
 	/* Other works can be queued before 'config->del_vqs()', so we flush
 	 * all works before to free the vsock object to avoid use after free.
 	 */
-	flush_work(&vsock->loopback_work);
 	flush_work(&vsock->rx_work);
 	flush_work(&vsock->tx_work);
 	flush_work(&vsock->event_work);
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-19 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-19 11:01 [PATCH net-next 0/6] vsock: add local transport support Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-19 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] vsock/virtio_transport_common: remove unused virtio header includes Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-19 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] vsock: add VMADDR_CID_LOCAL definition Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 14:49   ` Jorgen Hansen
2019-11-19 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] vsock: add local transport support in the vsock core Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 15:04   ` Jorgen Hansen
2019-11-21 15:21     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 15:53       ` Jorgen Hansen
2019-11-21 16:12         ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 16:19           ` Jorgen Hansen
2019-11-19 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] vsock: add vsock_loopback transport Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-20  1:15   ` David Miller
2019-11-20  9:00     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21  9:34   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-21  9:59     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 15:25       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-22  9:25         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-22 10:02           ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-19 11:01 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] vsock: use local transport when it is loaded Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21  9:46   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-21 10:01     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-19 11:01 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2019-11-21  9:46 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] vsock: add local transport support Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-21 10:05   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-11-21 14:45 ` Jorgen Hansen
2019-11-21 15:13   ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191119110121.14480-7-sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jhansen@vmware.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).