[PATCH 2/2] act_ct: support asymmetric conntrack

From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>,
	Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] act_ct: support asymmetric conntrack
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2019 16:34:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203213414.24109-2-aconole@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203213414.24109-1-aconole@redhat.com>

The act_ct TC module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure
exposed via netfilter.  It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and
DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision.  Netfilter can support
this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and
again after egress.  The act_ct action doesn't have such capability.

Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to
keep the symmetry.

Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
NOTE: this is a repost to see if the email client issues go away.

 net/sched/act_ct.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index ae0de372b1c8..bf2d69335d4b 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			  bool commit)
 {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
+	int err;
 	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
 
 	if (!(ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT))
@@ -359,7 +360,17 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		return NF_ACCEPT;
 	}
 
-	return ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+	err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+	if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
+	    ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
+		if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
+			maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
+		else
+			maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
+
+		err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+	}
+	return err;
 #else
 	return NF_ACCEPT;
 #endif
-- 
2.21.0

