From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Remove kfree_call_rcu_nobatch()
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:11:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210041147.3181-7-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210041118.GA3115@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Now that the kfree_rcu() special-casing has been removed from tree RCU,
this commit removes kfree_call_rcu_nobatch() since it is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 ----
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 5 -----
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 10 +---------
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 18 ++++--------------
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 3ce270b..ed83d6d 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3991,10 +3991,6 @@
Number of loops doing rcuperf.kfree_alloc_num number
of allocations and frees.
- rcuperf.kfree_no_batch= [KNL]
- Use the non-batching (less efficient) version of kfree_rcu().
- This is useful for comparing with the batched version.
-
rcuperf.nreaders= [KNL]
Set number of RCU readers. The value -1 selects
N, where N is the number of CPUs. A value
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 1bd166a..b2b2dc9 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
call_rcu(head, func);
}
-static inline void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
-{
- call_rcu(head, func);
-}
-
void rcu_qs(void);
static inline void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 6a65d3a..2f787b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
-void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
void rcu_barrier(void);
bool rcu_eqs_special_set(int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
index c1e25fd..da94b89 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
@@ -593,7 +593,6 @@ rcu_perf_shutdown(void *arg)
torture_param(int, kfree_nthreads, -1, "Number of threads running loops of kfree_rcu().");
torture_param(int, kfree_alloc_num, 8000, "Number of allocations and frees done in an iteration.");
torture_param(int, kfree_loops, 10, "Number of loops doing kfree_alloc_num allocations and frees.");
-torture_param(int, kfree_no_batch, 0, "Use the non-batching (slower) version of kfree_rcu().");
static struct task_struct **kfree_reader_tasks;
static int kfree_nrealthreads;
@@ -632,14 +631,7 @@ kfree_perf_thread(void *arg)
if (!alloc_ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (!kfree_no_batch) {
- kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
- } else {
- rcu_callback_t cb;
-
- cb = (rcu_callback_t)(unsigned long)offsetof(struct kfree_obj, rh);
- kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(&(alloc_ptr->rh), cb);
- }
+ kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
}
cond_resched();
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a8dd612..31d2d92 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2763,8 +2763,10 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_callback(rcu_state.name, head, offset);
- /* Could be possible to optimize with kfree_bulk in future */
- kfree((void *)head - offset);
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset))) {
+ /* Could be optimized with kfree_bulk() in future. */
+ kfree((void *)head - offset);
+ }
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
@@ -2836,16 +2838,6 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
/*
- * This version of kfree_call_rcu does not do batching of kfree_rcu() requests.
- * Used only by rcuperf torture test for comparison with kfree_rcu_batch().
- */
-void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
-{
- __call_rcu(head, func);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu_nobatch);
-
-/*
* Queue a request for lazy invocation of kfree() after a grace period.
*
* Each kfree_call_rcu() request is added to a batch. The batch will be drained
@@ -2864,8 +2856,6 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
unsigned long flags;
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp;
- head->func = func;
-
local_irq_save(flags); // For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().
krcp = this_cpu_ptr(&krc);
if (krcp->initialized)
--
2.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 4:11 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] kfree_rcu() updates for v5.6 Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] rcu: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/7] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/7] rcu: Make kfree_rcu() use a non-atomic ->monitor_todo paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] rcu: Add multiple in-flight batches of kfree_rcu() work paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] rcu: Add support for debug_objects debugging for kfree_rcu() paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Remove kfree_rcu() special casing and lazy-callback handling paulmck
2019-12-10 4:11 ` paulmck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210041147.3181-7-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).