From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: Avoid data-race in rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake()
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:26:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210042629.3808-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210042606.GA3624@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
The rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake() function uses rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp()
to read ->gp_tasks while other cpus might overwrite this field.
We need READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairs to avoid compiler
tricks and KCSAN splats like the following :
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake / rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore
write to 0xffffffff85a7f190 of 8 bytes by task 7317 on cpu 0:
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore+0x43d/0x580 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:507
rcu_read_unlock_special+0xec/0x370 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:659
__rcu_read_unlock+0xcf/0xe0 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:394
rcu_read_unlock include/linux/rcupdate.h:645 [inline]
__ip_queue_xmit+0x3b0/0xa40 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:533
ip_queue_xmit+0x45/0x60 include/net/ip.h:236
__tcp_transmit_skb+0xdeb/0x1cd0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1158
__tcp_send_ack+0x246/0x300 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3685
tcp_send_ack+0x34/0x40 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3691
tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x130/0x360 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1575
tcp_recvmsg+0x633/0x1a30 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2179
inet_recvmsg+0xbb/0x250 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:838
sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:871 [inline]
sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:889 [inline]
sock_recvmsg+0x92/0xb0 net/socket.c:885
sock_read_iter+0x15f/0x1e0 net/socket.c:967
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:1864 [inline]
new_sync_read+0x389/0x4f0 fs/read_write.c:414
read to 0xffffffff85a7f190 of 8 bytes by task 10 on cpu 1:
rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake kernel/rcu/tree.c:1556 [inline]
rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake+0x93/0xd0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1546
rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x36c/0x580 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1611
rcu_gp_kthread+0x143/0x220 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1768
kthread+0x1d4/0x200 drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c:1253
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 1 PID: 10 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 5.3.0+ #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
[ paulmck: Added another READ_ONCE() for RCU CPU stall warnings. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 758bfe1..fe5f448 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
* blocked tasks.
*/
if (!rnp->gp_tasks && (blkd_state & RCU_GP_BLKD)) {
- rnp->gp_tasks = &t->rcu_node_entry;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, &t->rcu_node_entry);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completedqs == rnp->gp_seq);
}
if (!rnp->exp_tasks && (blkd_state & RCU_EXP_BLKD))
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
*/
static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- return rnp->gp_tasks != NULL;
+ return READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks) != NULL;
}
/* Bias and limit values for ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. */
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
rnp->gp_seq, t->pid);
if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->gp_tasks)
- rnp->gp_tasks = np;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, np);
if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
rnp->exp_tasks = np;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST)) {
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
dump_blkd_tasks(rnp, 10);
if (rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp) &&
(rnp->qsmaskinit || rnp->wait_blkd_tasks)) {
- rnp->gp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, rnp->blkd_tasks.next);
t = container_of(rnp->gp_tasks, struct task_struct,
rcu_node_entry);
trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(TPS("rcu_preempt-GPS"),
@@ -757,7 +757,8 @@ dump_blkd_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp, int ncheck)
pr_info("%s: %d:%d ->qsmask %#lx ->qsmaskinit %#lx ->qsmaskinitnext %#lx\n",
__func__, rnp1->grplo, rnp1->grphi, rnp1->qsmask, rnp1->qsmaskinit, rnp1->qsmaskinitnext);
pr_info("%s: ->gp_tasks %p ->boost_tasks %p ->exp_tasks %p\n",
- __func__, rnp->gp_tasks, rnp->boost_tasks, rnp->exp_tasks);
+ __func__, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks), rnp->boost_tasks,
+ rnp->exp_tasks);
pr_info("%s: ->blkd_tasks", __func__);
i = 0;
list_for_each(lhp, &rnp->blkd_tasks) {
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 4:26 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] Preemptible-RCU updates for v5.6 Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu/nocb: Fix dump_tree hierarchy print always active paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` paulmck [this message]
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: Use lockdep rather than comment to enforce lock held paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu: Make PREEMPT_RCU be a modifier to TREE_RCU paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriate paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu: Rename some instance of CONFIG_PREEMPTION to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: Clear .exp_hint only when deferred quiescent state has been reported paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Clear ->rcu_read_unlock_special only once paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: Use READ_ONCE() for ->expmask in rcu_read_unlock_special() paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: Provide wrappers for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting paulmck
2019-12-10 4:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: Avoid tick_dep_set_cpu() misordering paulmck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210042629.3808-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).