linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org, swboyd@chromium.org
Cc: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>,
	saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
	sidgup@codeaurora.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Make SMC macros less magical
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:51:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0101016efb7353b8-d392d835-835b-4851-a560-4d6a11e7d46a-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1576176651-17089-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org>

Improve understandability of SMC macros by reversing the logic as they
are all functions of how many arguments can be shoved in registers and
how many SCM arguments are supported.

There aren't 4 register arguments because are 7 arguments that go into a
buffer - there are up to 7 arguments that are overflowed into a buffer
because only 4 registers are allocated for arguments.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
index 976c2b9..3101f36 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
 #define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS 30
 #define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_MAX_RETRY 20
 
-#define SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS 7
-#define SCM_SMC_FIRST_EXT_IDX 3
-#define SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS (MAX_QCOM_SCM_ARGS - SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS + 1)
+#define SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS	4
+#define SCM_SMC_FIRST_EXT_IDX	(SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS - 1)
+#define SCM_SMC_N_EXT_ARGS	(MAX_QCOM_SCM_ARGS - SCM_SMC_N_REG_ARGS + 1)
 
 static void __scm_smc_do_quirk(const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
 			       struct arm_smccc_res *res, u32 fn_id,
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1576176651-17089-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org>
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Rename macros and structures Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Apply consistent naming scheme to command IDs Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` Elliot Berman [this message]
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Remove unused qcom_scm_get_version Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move svc/cmd/owner into qcom_scm_desc Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Improve SMC convention detection Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add SCM results struct Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Add funcnum IDs Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move SMC register filling to qcom_scm_call_smccc Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use SMC arch wrappers Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Move SMCCC register filling to qcom_scm_call Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Create common legacy atomic call Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use qcom_scm_desc in non-atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Add device argument to atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Order functions, definitions by service/command Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Dynamically support SMCCC and legacy conventions Elliot Berman
2019-12-12 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Remove thin wrappers Elliot Berman
2020-01-05 11:21   ` Stephan Gerhold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0101016efb7353b8-d392d835-835b-4851-a560-4d6a11e7d46a-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com \
    --to=eberman@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).