linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] efi: Add a flags parameter to efi_memory_map
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:04:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157782986309.367056.18234587970434659175.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157782985777.367056.14741265874314204783.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

In preparation for garbage collecting dynamically allocated efi memory
maps, where the allocation method of memblock vs slab needs to be
recalled, convert the existing 'late' flag into a 'flags' bitmask.

Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c |   24 +++++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/efi.h           |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
index 38b686c67b17..813674ef9000 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init efi_memmap_alloc(unsigned int num_entries)
 /**
  * __efi_memmap_init - Common code for mapping the EFI memory map
  * @data: EFI memory map data
- * @late: Use early or late mapping function?
+ * @flags: Use early or late mapping function?
  *
  * This function takes care of figuring out which function to use to
  * map the EFI memory map in efi.memmap based on how far into the boot
@@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ phys_addr_t __init efi_memmap_alloc(unsigned int num_entries)
  * Returns zero on success, a negative error code on failure.
  */
 static int __init
-__efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
+__efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	struct efi_memory_map map;
+	struct efi_memory_map map = { 0 };
 	phys_addr_t phys_map;
 
 	if (efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT))
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 
 	phys_map = data->phys_map;
 
-	if (late)
+	if (flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE)
 		map.map = memremap(phys_map, data->size, MEMREMAP_WB);
 	else
 		map.map = early_memremap(phys_map, data->size);
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 
 	map.desc_version = data->desc_version;
 	map.desc_size = data->desc_size;
-	map.late = late;
+	map.flags |= flags;
 
 	set_bit(EFI_MEMMAP, &efi.flags);
 
@@ -111,9 +111,9 @@ __efi_memmap_init(struct efi_memory_map_data *data, bool late)
 int __init efi_memmap_init_early(struct efi_memory_map_data *data)
 {
 	/* Cannot go backwards */
-	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.late);
+	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE);
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(data, false);
+	return __efi_memmap_init(data, 0);
 }
 
 void __init efi_memmap_unmap(void)
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void __init efi_memmap_unmap(void)
 	if (!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
 		return;
 
-	if (!efi.memmap.late) {
+	if (!(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE)) {
 		unsigned long size;
 
 		size = efi.memmap.desc_size * efi.memmap.nr_map;
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.map);
 
 	/* Were we already called? */
-	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.late);
+	WARN_ON(efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE);
 
 	/*
 	 * It makes no sense to allow callers to register different
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 	data.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version;
 	data.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size;
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, true);
+	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, EFI_MEMMAP_LATE);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_init_late(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
 int __init efi_memmap_install(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int nr_map)
 {
 	struct efi_memory_map_data data;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	efi_memmap_unmap();
 
@@ -202,8 +203,9 @@ int __init efi_memmap_install(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int nr_map)
 	data.size = efi.memmap.desc_size * nr_map;
 	data.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version;
 	data.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size;
+	flags = efi.memmap.flags & EFI_MEMMAP_LATE;
 
-	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, efi.memmap.late);
+	return __efi_memmap_init(&data, flags);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index aa54586db7a5..b8e930f5ff77 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -795,7 +795,8 @@ struct efi_memory_map {
 	int nr_map;
 	unsigned long desc_version;
 	unsigned long desc_size;
-	bool late;
+#define EFI_MEMMAP_LATE (1UL << 0)
+	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
 struct efi_mem_range {


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-31 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-31 22:04 [PATCH v2 0/4] efi: Fix handling of multiple efi_fake_mem= entries Dan Williams
2019-12-31 22:04 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-12-31 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] efi: Add tracking for dynamically allocated memmaps Dan Williams
2019-12-31 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] efi: Fix efi_memmap_alloc() leaks Dan Williams
2020-01-01  3:35   ` Dave Young
2020-01-01  4:52     ` Dan Williams
2019-12-31 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] efi: Fix handling of multiple efi_fake_mem= entries Dan Williams
2020-01-01  4:51   ` Dave Young
2020-01-01  5:04     ` Dan Williams
2020-01-01  6:15       ` Dave Young
2020-01-01  6:20         ` Dave Young
2020-01-01 18:36           ` Dan Williams
2020-01-02  2:21             ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157782986309.367056.18234587970434659175.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).