linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
	Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick
Date: Thu,  2 Jan 2020 18:07:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1577959674-255537-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

Every time we call irqtime_account_process_tick() is in a interrupt,
Every caller will get and assign a parameter rq = this_rq(), This is
unnecessary and increase the code size a little bit. Move the rq getting
action to irqtime_account_process_tick internally is better.

             base               with this patch
cputime.o    578792 bytes        577888 bytes

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/sched/cputime.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index d43318a489f2..cff3e656566d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times)
  * softirq as those do not count in task exec_runtime any more.
  */
 static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
-					 struct rq *rq, int ticks)
+					 int ticks)
 {
 	u64 other, cputime = TICK_NSEC * ticks;
 
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
 		account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
 	} else if (user_tick) {
 		account_user_time(p, cputime);
-	} else if (p == rq->idle) {
+	} else if (p == this_rq()->idle) {
 		account_idle_time(cputime);
 	} else if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) { /* System time or guest time */
 		account_guest_time(p, cputime);
@@ -392,14 +392,12 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
 
 static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks)
 {
-	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-
-	irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq, ticks);
+	irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, ticks);
 }
 #else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 static inline void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) { }
 static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
-						struct rq *rq, int nr_ticks) { }
+						int nr_ticks) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 
 /*
@@ -473,13 +471,12 @@ void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st)
 void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
 {
 	u64 cputime, steal;
-	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
 
 	if (vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu())
 		return;
 
 	if (sched_clock_irqtime) {
-		irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, rq, 1);
+		irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, 1);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -493,7 +490,7 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
 
 	if (user_tick)
 		account_user_time(p, cputime);
-	else if ((p != rq->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
+	else if ((p != this_rq()->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
 		account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, cputime);
 	else
 		account_idle_time(cputime);
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-01-02 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-02 10:07 Alex Shi [this message]
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/cputime: code cleanup in irqtime_account_process_tick Alex Shi
2020-01-06 15:53   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-01-07  9:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-09 13:30       ` Alex Shi
2020-01-02 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/cputime: cleanup account_process_tick/account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
2020-01-06 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/cputime: move rq parameter in irqtime_account_process_tick Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 10:08 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1577959674-255537-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).