From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] livepatch/selftest: Clean up shadow variable names and type
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:31:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200116153145.2392-3-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116153145.2392-1-pmladek@suse.com>
The shadow variable selftest is quite tricky. Especially it is problematic
to understand what values are stored, returned, and printed.
Make it easier to understand by using "int *var, **sv" variables
consistently everywhere instead of the generic "void *", "ret",
and "ctor_data".
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c b/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
index fe5c413efe96..4e94f46234e8 100644
--- a/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
+++ b/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
@@ -60,36 +60,43 @@ static int ptr_id(void *ptr)
*/
static void *shadow_get(void *obj, unsigned long id)
{
- void *ret = klp_shadow_get(obj, id);
+ int **sv;
+ sv = klp_shadow_get(obj, id);
pr_info("klp_%s(obj=PTR%d, id=0x%lx) = PTR%d\n",
- __func__, ptr_id(obj), id, ptr_id(ret));
+ __func__, ptr_id(obj), id, ptr_id(sv));
- return ret;
+ return sv;
}
static void *shadow_alloc(void *obj, unsigned long id, size_t size,
gfp_t gfp_flags, klp_shadow_ctor_t ctor,
void *ctor_data)
{
- void *ret = klp_shadow_alloc(obj, id, size, gfp_flags, ctor,
- ctor_data);
+ int *var = ctor_data;
+ int **sv;
+
+ sv = klp_shadow_alloc(obj, id, size, gfp_flags, ctor, var);
pr_info("klp_%s(obj=PTR%d, id=0x%lx, size=%zx, gfp_flags=%pGg), ctor=PTR%d, ctor_data=PTR%d = PTR%d\n",
__func__, ptr_id(obj), id, size, &gfp_flags, ptr_id(ctor),
- ptr_id(ctor_data), ptr_id(ret));
- return ret;
+ ptr_id(var), ptr_id(sv));
+
+ return sv;
}
static void *shadow_get_or_alloc(void *obj, unsigned long id, size_t size,
gfp_t gfp_flags, klp_shadow_ctor_t ctor,
void *ctor_data)
{
- void *ret = klp_shadow_get_or_alloc(obj, id, size, gfp_flags, ctor,
- ctor_data);
+ int *var = ctor_data;
+ int **sv;
+
+ sv = klp_shadow_get_or_alloc(obj, id, size, gfp_flags, ctor, var);
pr_info("klp_%s(obj=PTR%d, id=0x%lx, size=%zx, gfp_flags=%pGg), ctor=PTR%d, ctor_data=PTR%d = PTR%d\n",
__func__, ptr_id(obj), id, size, &gfp_flags, ptr_id(ctor),
- ptr_id(ctor_data), ptr_id(ret));
- return ret;
+ ptr_id(var), ptr_id(sv));
+
+ return sv;
}
static void shadow_free(void *obj, unsigned long id, klp_shadow_dtor_t dtor)
@@ -110,18 +117,22 @@ static void shadow_free_all(unsigned long id, klp_shadow_dtor_t dtor)
/* Shadow variable constructor - remember simple pointer data */
static int shadow_ctor(void *obj, void *shadow_data, void *ctor_data)
{
- int **shadow_int = shadow_data;
- *shadow_int = ctor_data;
+ int **sv = shadow_data;
+ int *var = ctor_data;
+
+ *sv = var;
pr_info("%s: PTR%d -> PTR%d\n",
- __func__, ptr_id(shadow_int), ptr_id(ctor_data));
+ __func__, ptr_id(sv), ptr_id(var));
return 0;
}
static void shadow_dtor(void *obj, void *shadow_data)
{
+ int **sv = shadow_data;
+
pr_info("%s(obj=PTR%d, shadow_data=PTR%d)\n",
- __func__, ptr_id(obj), ptr_id(shadow_data));
+ __func__, ptr_id(obj), ptr_id(sv));
}
static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
@@ -134,7 +145,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
int var1, var2, var3, var4;
int **sv1, **sv2, **sv3, **sv4;
- void *ret;
+ int **sv;
ptr_id(NULL);
ptr_id(&var1);
@@ -146,8 +157,8 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
* With an empty shadow variable hash table, expect not to find
* any matches.
*/
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id);
+ if (!sv)
pr_info(" got expected NULL result\n");
/*
@@ -169,23 +180,23 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
* Verify we can find our new shadow variables and that they point
* to expected data.
*/
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id);
+ if (!sv)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ret == sv1 && *sv1 == &var1)
+ if (sv == sv1 && *sv1 == &var1)
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv1), ptr_id(*sv1));
- ret = shadow_get(obj + 1, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj + 1, id);
+ if (!sv)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ret == sv2 && *sv2 == &var2)
+ if (sv == sv2 && *sv2 == &var2)
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv2), ptr_id(*sv2));
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id + 1);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id + 1);
+ if (!sv)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ret == sv3 && *sv3 == &var3)
+ if (sv == sv3 && *sv3 == &var3)
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv3), ptr_id(*sv3));
@@ -197,10 +208,10 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
if (!sv4)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = shadow_get_or_alloc(obj + 2, id, size, gfp_flags, shadow_ctor, &var4);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get_or_alloc(obj + 2, id, size, gfp_flags, shadow_ctor, &var4);
+ if (!sv)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ret == sv4 && *sv4 == &var4)
+ if (sv == sv4 && *sv4 == &var4)
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv4), ptr_id(*sv4));
@@ -209,27 +220,27 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
* longer find them.
*/
shadow_free(obj, id, shadow_dtor); /* sv1 */
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id);
+ if (!sv)
pr_info(" got expected NULL result\n");
shadow_free(obj + 1, id, shadow_dtor); /* sv2 */
- ret = shadow_get(obj + 1, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj + 1, id);
+ if (!sv)
pr_info(" got expected NULL result\n");
shadow_free(obj + 2, id, shadow_dtor); /* sv4 */
- ret = shadow_get(obj + 2, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj + 2, id);
+ if (!sv)
pr_info(" got expected NULL result\n");
/*
* We should still find an <id+1> variable.
*/
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id + 1);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id + 1);
+ if (!sv)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ret == sv3 && *sv3 == &var3)
+ if (sv == sv3 && *sv3 == &var3)
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv3), ptr_id(*sv3));
@@ -237,8 +248,8 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
* Free all the <id+1> variables, too.
*/
shadow_free_all(id + 1, shadow_dtor); /* sv3 */
- ret = shadow_get(obj, id);
- if (!ret)
+ sv = shadow_get(obj, id);
+ if (!sv)
pr_info(" shadow_get() got expected NULL result\n");
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 15:31 [PATCH 0/4] livepatch/samples/selftest: Clean up show variables handling Petr Mladek
2020-01-16 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] livepatch/sample: Use the right type for the leaking data pointer Petr Mladek
2020-01-16 15:31 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-01-16 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] livepatch/samples/selftest: Use klp_shadow_alloc() API correctly Petr Mladek
2020-01-16 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] livepatch: Handle allocation failure in the sample of shadow variable API Petr Mladek
2020-01-16 19:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] livepatch/samples/selftest: Clean up show variables handling Joe Lawrence
2020-01-17 8:26 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-01-17 9:41 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2020-01-17 10:13 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200116153145.2392-3-pmladek@suse.com \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).