From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v13] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:53:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123035359.GA23659@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123004507.GA2403906@rani.riverdale.lan>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
A split-lock occurs when an atomic instruction operates on data
that spans two cache lines. In order to maintain atomicity the
core takes a global bus lock.
This is typically >1000 cycles slower than an atomic operation
within a cache line. It also disrupts performance on other cores
(which must wait for the bus lock to be released before their
memory operations can complete. For real-time systems this may
mean missing deadlines. For other systems it may just be very
annoying.
Some CPUs have the capability to raise an #AC trap when a
split lock is attempted.
Provide a command line option to give the user choices on how
to handle this. split_lock_detect=
off - not enabled (no traps for split locks)
warn - warn once when an application does a
split lock, bust allow it to continue
running.
fatal - Send SIGBUS to applications that cause split lock
Default is "warn". Note that if the kernel hits a split lock
in any mode other than "off" it will OOPs.
One implementation wrinkle is that the MSR to control the
split lock detection is per-core, not per thread. This might
result in some short lived races on HT systems in "warn" mode
if Linux tries to enable on one thread while disabling on
the other. Race analysis by Sean Christopherson:
- Toggling of split-lock is only done in "warn" mode. Worst case
scenario of a race is that a misbehaving task will generate multiple
#AC exceptions on the same instruction. And this race will only occur
if both siblings are running tasks that generate split-lock #ACs, e.g.
a race where sibling threads are writing different values will only
occur if CPUx is disabling split-lock after an #AC and CPUy is
re-enabling split-lock after *its* previous task generated an #AC.
- Transitioning between modes at runtime isn't supported and disabling
is tracked per task, so hardware will always reach a steady state that
matches the configured mode. I.e. split-lock is guaranteed to be
enabled in hardware once all _TIF_SLD threads have been scheduled out.
Co-developed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
v13: (rebased to tip/master because of first item below)
Boris: X86 features word 7 is full, move to word 11
Boris: MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES too long. Abbreviate
(but include comment with SDM matching name)
Arvind: Missed a comment from Sean about bogus test in
trap handling. Delete it.
Arvind: split_lock_init() accesses MSR on platforms that
don't support it. Change default to "off" and
only upgrade to "warn" on platforms that support
split lock detect.
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 18 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 17 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 9 +
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 6 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 3 +
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 24 ++-
9 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 7f1e2f327e43..b420e0cebc0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3207,6 +3207,24 @@
nosoftlockup [KNL] Disable the soft-lockup detector.
+ split_lock_ac=
+ [X86] Enable split lock detection
+
+ When enabled (and if hardware support is present), atomic
+ instructions that access data across cache line
+ boundaries will result in an alignment check exception.
+
+ off - not enabled
+
+ warn - the kernel will pr_alert about applications
+ triggering the #AC exception
+
+ fatal - the kernel will SIGBUS applications that
+ trigger the #AC exception.
+
+ For any more other than 'off' the kernel will die if
+ it (or firmware) will trigger #AC.
+
nosync [HW,M68K] Disables sync negotiation for all devices.
nowatchdog [KNL] Disable both lockup detectors, i.e.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index adc6cc86b062..32a295533e2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -40,4 +40,21 @@ int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
unsigned int x86_family(unsigned int sig);
unsigned int x86_model(unsigned int sig);
unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
+extern void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
+extern bool split_lock_detect_enabled(void);
+extern bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code);
+extern void switch_sld(struct task_struct *);
+#else
+static inline void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
+static inline bool split_lock_detect_enabled(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+static inline void switch_sld(struct task_struct *prev) {}
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index f3327cb56edf..cd56ad5d308e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL (11*32+ 3) /* LLC Local MBM monitoring */
#define X86_FEATURE_FENCE_SWAPGS_USER (11*32+ 4) /* "" LFENCE in user entry SWAPGS path */
#define X86_FEATURE_FENCE_SWAPGS_KERNEL (11*32+ 5) /* "" LFENCE in kernel entry SWAPGS path */
+#define X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT (11*32+ 6) /* #AC for split lock */
/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */
#define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16 (12*32+ 5) /* AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions */
@@ -367,6 +368,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_STIBP (18*32+27) /* "" Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors */
#define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D (18*32+28) /* Flush L1D cache */
#define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (18*32+29) /* IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR (Intel) */
+#define X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES (18*32+30) /* "" IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR */
#define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD (18*32+31) /* "" Speculative Store Bypass Disable */
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index ebe1685e92dd..8821697a7549 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
/* Intel MSRs. Some also available on other CPUs */
+#define MSR_TEST_CTRL 0x00000033
+#define MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_BIT 29
+#define MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT BIT(MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_BIT)
+
#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048 /* Speculation Control */
#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS BIT(0) /* Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation */
#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP_SHIFT 1 /* Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictor (STIBP) bit */
@@ -70,6 +74,11 @@
*/
#define MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_TIME_MASK (~0x03U)
+/* Abbreviated from Intel SDM name IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES */
+#define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS 0x000000cf
+#define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_BIT 5
+#define MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT BIT(MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT_BIT)
+
#define MSR_PKG_CST_CONFIG_CONTROL 0x000000e2
#define NHM_C3_AUTO_DEMOTE (1UL << 25)
#define NHM_C1_AUTO_DEMOTE (1UL << 26)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index cf4327986e98..e0d12517f348 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct thread_info {
#define TIF_NOCPUID 15 /* CPUID is not accessible in userland */
#define TIF_NOTSC 16 /* TSC is not accessible in userland */
#define TIF_IA32 17 /* IA32 compatibility process */
+#define TIF_SLD 18 /* Restore split lock detection on context switch */
#define TIF_NOHZ 19 /* in adaptive nohz mode */
#define TIF_MEMDIE 20 /* is terminating due to OOM killer */
#define TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG 21 /* idle is polling for TIF_NEED_RESCHED */
@@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ struct thread_info {
#define _TIF_NOCPUID (1 << TIF_NOCPUID)
#define _TIF_NOTSC (1 << TIF_NOTSC)
#define _TIF_IA32 (1 << TIF_IA32)
+#define _TIF_SLD (1 << TIF_SLD)
#define _TIF_NOHZ (1 << TIF_NOHZ)
#define _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG (1 << TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG)
#define _TIF_IO_BITMAP (1 << TIF_IO_BITMAP)
@@ -158,9 +160,9 @@ struct thread_info {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IOPL_IOPERM
# define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_PREV (_TIF_WORK_CTXSW| _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY | \
- _TIF_IO_BITMAP)
+ _TIF_IO_BITMAP | _TIF_SLD)
#else
-# define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_PREV (_TIF_WORK_CTXSW| _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY)
+# define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_PREV (_TIF_WORK_CTXSW| _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY | _TIF_SLD)
#endif
#define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_NEXT (_TIF_WORK_CTXSW)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 86b8241c8209..adb2f639f388 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1242,6 +1242,8 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
cpu_set_bug_bits(c);
+ cpu_set_core_cap_bits(c);
+
fpu__init_system(c);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 57473e2c0869..b6046ccfa372 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#include <asm/microcode_intel.h>
#include <asm/hwcap2.h>
#include <asm/elf.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
+#include <asm/cmdline.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -31,6 +33,20 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#endif
+enum split_lock_detect_state {
+ sld_off = 0,
+ sld_warn,
+ sld_fatal,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Default to sld_off because most systems do not support
+ * split lock detection. split_lock_setup() will switch this
+ * to sld_warn, and then check to see if there is a command
+ * line override.
+ */
+static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state = sld_off;
+
/*
* Just in case our CPU detection goes bad, or you have a weird system,
* allow a way to override the automatic disabling of MPX.
@@ -606,6 +622,8 @@ static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
wrmsrl(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, msr);
}
+static void split_lock_init(void);
+
static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
early_init_intel(c);
@@ -720,6 +738,8 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
tsx_enable();
if (tsx_ctrl_state == TSX_CTRL_DISABLE)
tsx_disable();
+
+ split_lock_init();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -981,3 +1001,160 @@ static const struct cpu_dev intel_cpu_dev = {
};
cpu_dev_register(intel_cpu_dev);
+
+#undef pr_fmt
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "x86/split lock detection: " fmt
+
+static const struct {
+ const char *option;
+ enum split_lock_detect_state state;
+} sld_options[] __initconst = {
+ { "off", sld_off },
+ { "warn", sld_warn },
+ { "fatal", sld_fatal },
+};
+
+static inline bool match_option(const char *arg, int arglen, const char *opt)
+{
+ int len = strlen(opt);
+
+ return len == arglen && !strncmp(arg, opt, len);
+}
+
+static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
+{
+ enum split_lock_detect_state sld;
+ char arg[20];
+ int i, ret;
+
+ sld_state = sld = sld_warn;
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
+
+ ret = cmdline_find_option(boot_command_line, "split_lock_ac",
+ arg, sizeof(arg));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto print;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sld_options); i++) {
+ if (match_option(arg, ret, sld_options[i].option)) {
+ sld = sld_options[i].state;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (sld != sld_state)
+ sld_state = sld;
+
+print:
+ switch(sld) {
+ case sld_off:
+ pr_info("disabled\n");
+ break;
+
+ case sld_warn:
+ pr_info("warning about user-space split_locks\n");
+ break;
+
+ case sld_fatal:
+ pr_info("sending SIGBUS on user-space split_locks\n");
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * The TEST_CTRL MSR is per core. So multiple threads can
+ * read/write the MSR in parallel. But it's possible to
+ * simplify the read/write without locking and without
+ * worry about overwriting the MSR because only bit 29
+ * is implemented in the MSR and the bit is set as 1 by all
+ * threads. Locking may be needed in the future if situation
+ * is changed e.g. other bits are implemented.
+ */
+
+static bool __sld_msr_set(bool on)
+{
+ u64 test_ctrl_val;
+
+ if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, &test_ctrl_val))
+ return false;
+
+ if (on)
+ test_ctrl_val |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+ else
+ test_ctrl_val &= ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+
+ if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void split_lock_init(void)
+{
+ if (sld_state == sld_off)
+ return;
+
+ if (__sld_msr_set(true))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If this is anything other than the boot-cpu, you've done
+ * funny things and you get to keep whatever pieces.
+ */
+ pr_warn("MSR fail -- disabled\n");
+ __sld_msr_set(sld_off);
+}
+
+bool split_lock_detect_enabled(void)
+{
+ return sld_state != sld_off;
+}
+
+bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+{
+ if ((regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC) || sld_state == sld_fatal)
+ return false;
+
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("#AC: %s/%d took a split_lock trap at address: 0x%lx\n",
+ current->comm, current->pid, regs->ip);
+
+ __sld_msr_set(false);
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SLD);
+ return true;
+}
+
+void switch_sld(struct task_struct *prev)
+{
+ __sld_msr_set(true);
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(prev, TIF_SLD);
+}
+
+#define SPLIT_LOCK_CPU(model) {X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY}
+
+/*
+ * The following processors have split lock detection feature. But since they
+ * don't have MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES, the feature cannot be enumerated by
+ * the MSR. So enumerate the feature by family and model on these processors.
+ */
+static const struct x86_cpu_id split_lock_cpu_ids[] __initconst = {
+ SPLIT_LOCK_CPU(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_X),
+ SPLIT_LOCK_CPU(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_L),
+ {}
+};
+
+void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ u64 ia32_core_caps = 0;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES)) {
+ /* Enumerate features reported in IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR. */
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS, ia32_core_caps);
+ } else if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) {
+ /* Enumerate split lock detection by family and model. */
+ if (x86_match_cpu(split_lock_cpu_ids))
+ ia32_core_caps |= MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+ }
+
+ if (ia32_core_caps & MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)
+ split_lock_setup();
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 839b5244e3b7..355760d36505 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -650,6 +650,9 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
/* Enforce MSR update to ensure consistent state */
__speculation_ctrl_update(~tifn, tifn);
}
+
+ if (tifp & _TIF_SLD)
+ switch_sld(prev_p);
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 9e6f822922a3..61c576b95184 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/fpu/internal.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/cpu_entry_area.h>
#include <asm/mce.h>
#include <asm/fixmap.h>
@@ -244,7 +245,6 @@ do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-
if (!do_trap_no_signal(tsk, trapnr, str, regs, error_code))
return;
@@ -290,9 +290,29 @@ DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_OLD_MF, SIGFPE, 0, NULL, "coprocessor segment overru
DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_TS, SIGSEGV, 0, NULL, "invalid TSS", invalid_TSS)
DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_NP, SIGBUS, 0, NULL, "segment not present", segment_not_present)
DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_SS, SIGBUS, 0, NULL, "stack segment", stack_segment)
-DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_AC, SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, NULL, "alignment check", alignment_check)
#undef IP
+dotraplinkage void do_alignment_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+{
+ const char str[] = "alignment check";
+
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "entry code didn't wake RCU");
+
+ if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, str, regs, error_code, X86_TRAP_AC, SIGBUS) == NOTIFY_STOP)
+ return;
+
+ if (!user_mode(regs))
+ die("Split lock detected\n", regs, error_code);
+
+ cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
+
+ if (handle_user_split_lock(regs, error_code))
+ return;
+
+ do_trap(X86_TRAP_AC, SIGBUS, "alignment check", regs,
+ error_code, BUS_ADRALN, NULL);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
__visible void __noreturn handle_stack_overflow(const char *message,
struct pt_regs *regs,
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-21 0:53 [PATCH v10 0/6] Enable split lock detection for real time and debug Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/msr-index: Add two new MSRs Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate the IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection by " Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] x86/split_lock: Enumerate split lock detection if the IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES MSR is not supported Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 22:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-22 0:37 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-22 2:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-22 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 22:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 23:14 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 23:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 0:53 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel parameter Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-21 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 21:51 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-21 22:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 22:29 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-21 23:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 23:53 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-22 1:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-22 2:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-22 2:39 ` Xiaoyao Li
2019-11-22 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 23:55 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 0:55 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 16:14 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-21 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-21 17:34 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 17:22 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 18:02 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 20:42 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-22 21:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-12 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 18:52 ` Luck, Tony
2019-12-12 19:46 ` Luck, Tony
2019-12-12 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-16 16:21 ` David Laight
2019-11-22 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-22 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-23 0:30 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-25 16:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-02 18:20 ` Luck, Tony
2019-12-12 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-10 19:24 ` [PATCH v11] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel Luck, Tony
2020-01-14 5:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-15 22:27 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-15 22:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-15 23:48 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-22 18:55 ` [PATCH v12] " Luck, Tony
2020-01-22 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-22 20:03 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-22 20:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-22 22:42 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-22 22:52 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-22 23:24 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-23 0:45 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-23 1:23 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-23 4:21 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-23 17:15 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-23 3:53 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2020-01-23 4:45 ` [PATCH v13] " Arvind Sankar
2020-01-23 23:16 ` [PATCH v14] " Luck, Tony
2020-01-24 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-25 2:47 ` [PATCH v15] " Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 10:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-25 19:55 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-25 20:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-25 21:42 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 22:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-25 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-25 13:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-25 22:07 ` [PATCH v16] " Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 22:43 ` Mark D Rustad
2020-01-25 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-26 17:27 ` Mark D Rustad
2020-01-26 20:05 ` [PATCH v17] " Luck, Tony
2020-01-29 12:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-29 15:24 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2020-02-03 20:41 ` [PATCH v17] " Sean Christopherson
2020-02-06 0:49 ` [PATCH] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Luck, Tony
2020-02-06 1:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-06 16:46 ` Luck, Tony
2020-02-06 19:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-03 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-04 0:04 ` [PATCH v17] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel Sean Christopherson
2020-02-04 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-26 0:34 ` [PATCH v16] " Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-26 20:01 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v15] " Arvind Sankar
2020-01-25 21:50 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-25 23:51 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-26 2:52 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-27 2:05 ` Tony Luck
2020-01-27 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-27 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-27 17:35 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-27 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-13 0:09 ` [PATCH v11] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel parameter Tony Luck
2019-12-13 0:16 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-21 17:43 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] " David Laight
2019-11-21 17:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 18:53 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 19:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-21 20:25 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-11-21 20:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 20:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 21:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-22 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 17:48 ` Luck, Tony
2019-11-22 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 21:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-11 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-11 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-11 22:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 19:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-16 9:59 ` David Laight
2019-12-16 17:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-16 17:45 ` David Laight
2019-12-16 18:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-17 10:03 ` David Laight
2019-12-11 18:44 ` Luck, Tony
2019-12-11 22:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 10:36 ` David Laight
2019-12-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-12 16:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-12 16:23 ` David Laight
2019-12-12 16:29 ` David Laight
2019-11-21 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 21:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-22 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-22 9:46 ` David Laight
2019-11-22 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-21 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200123035359.GA23659@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).