linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint
Date: Sun,  2 Feb 2020 21:36:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200203053650.8923-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)

Currently, rasdaemon uses the existing tracepoint block_rq_complete
and filters out non-error cases in order to capture block disk errors.

But there are a few problems with this approach:

1. Even kernel trace filter could do the filtering work, there is
   still some overhead after we enable this tracepoint.

2. The filter is merely based on errno, which does not align with kernel
   logic to check the errors for print_req_error().

3. block_rq_complete only provides dev major and minor to identify
   the block device, it is not convenient to use in user-space.

So introduce a new tracepoint block_rq_error just for the error case
and provides the device name for convenience too. With this patch,
rasdaemon could switch to block_rq_error.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c             |  4 +++-
 include/trace/events/block.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 089e890ab208..0c7ad70d06be 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1450,8 +1450,10 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error,
 #endif
 
 	if (unlikely(error && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(req) &&
-		     !(req->rq_flags & RQF_QUIET)))
+		     !(req->rq_flags & RQF_QUIET))) {
+		trace_block_rq_error(req, blk_status_to_errno(error), nr_bytes);
 		print_req_error(req, error, __func__);
+	}
 
 	blk_account_io_completion(req, nr_bytes);
 
diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
index 81b43f5bdf23..575054e7cfa0 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/block.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
@@ -145,6 +145,47 @@ TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_complete,
 		  __entry->nr_sector, __entry->error)
 );
 
+/**
+ * block_rq_error - block IO operation error reported by device driver
+ * @rq: block operations request
+ * @error: status code
+ * @nr_bytes: number of completed bytes
+ *
+ * The block_rq_error tracepoint event indicates that some portion
+ * of operation request has failed as reported by the device driver.
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_error,
+
+	TP_PROTO(struct request *rq, int error, unsigned int nr_bytes),
+
+	TP_ARGS(rq, error, nr_bytes),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(  dev_t,	dev			)
+		__string( name,		rq->rq_disk ? rq->rq_disk->disk_name : "?")
+		__field(  sector_t,	sector			)
+		__field(  unsigned int,	nr_sector		)
+		__field(  int,		error			)
+		__array(  char,		rwbs,	RWBS_LEN	)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->dev	   = rq->rq_disk ? disk_devt(rq->rq_disk) : 0;
+		__assign_str(name,   rq->rq_disk ? rq->rq_disk->disk_name : "?");
+		__entry->sector    = blk_rq_pos(rq);
+		__entry->nr_sector = nr_bytes >> 9;
+		__entry->error     = error;
+
+		blk_fill_rwbs(__entry->rwbs, rq->cmd_flags, nr_bytes);
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("%d,%d %s %s %llu + %u [%d]",
+		  MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
+		  __get_str(name), __entry->rwbs,
+		  (unsigned long long)__entry->sector,
+		  __entry->nr_sector, __entry->error)
+);
+
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq,
 
 	TP_PROTO(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq),
-- 
2.21.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-03  5:36 Cong Wang [this message]
2020-02-03 18:26 ` [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint Steven Rostedt
2020-02-03 20:24   ` Cong Wang
2020-02-18 18:40 ` Cong Wang
2020-02-25 20:37   ` Cong Wang
2022-01-24 20:54 ` Yang Shi
2022-01-25 14:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 14:38     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 19:58       ` Yang Shi
2022-01-25 20:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 20:19           ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200203053650.8923-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).