linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: mscc: fix in frame extraction
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:31:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217083133.20828-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> (raw)

Each extracted frame on Ocelot has an IFH. The frame and IFH are extracted
by reading chuncks of 4 bytes from a register.

In case the IFH and frames were read corretly it would try to read the next
frame. In case there are no more frames in the queue, it checks if there
were any previous errors and in that case clear the queue. But this check
will always succeed also when there are no errors. Because when extracting
the IFH the error is checked against 4(number of bytes read) and then the
error is set only if the extraction of the frame failed. So in a happy case
where there are no errors the err variable is still 4. So it could be
a case where after the check that there are no more frames in the queue, a
frame will arrive in the queue but because the error is not reseted, it
would try to flush the queue. So the frame will be lost.

The fix consist in resetting the error after reading the IFH.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c
index b38820849faa..1135a18019c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c
@@ -114,6 +114,14 @@ static irqreturn_t ocelot_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
 		if (err != 4)
 			break;
 
+		/* At this point the IFH was read correctly, so it is safe to
+		 * presume that there is no error. The err needs to be reset
+		 * otherwise a frame could come in CPU queue between the while
+		 * condition and the check for error later on. And in that case
+		 * the new frame is just removed and not processed.
+		 */
+		err = 0;
+
 		ocelot_parse_ifh(ifh, &info);
 
 		ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[info.port];
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-17  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17  8:31 Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2020-02-17  9:20 ` [PATCH] net: mscc: fix in frame extraction Alexandre Belloni
2020-02-17 22:06 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200217083133.20828-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).