linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pkeys: Manually set X86_FEATURE_OSPKE to preserve existing changes
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:16:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226231615.13664-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)

Explicitly set X86_FEATURE_OSPKE via set_cpu_cap() instead of calling
get_cpu_cap() to pull the feature bit from CPUID after enabling CR4.PKE.
Invoking get_cpu_cap() effectively wipes out any {set,clear}_cpu_cap()
changes that were made between this_cpu->c_init() and setup_pku(), as
all non-synthetic feature words are reinitialized from the CPU's CPUID
values.

Blasting away capability updates manifests most visibility when running
on a VMX capable CPU, but with VMX disabled by BIOS.  To indicate that
VMX is disabled, init_ia32_feat_ctl() clears X86_FEATURE_VMX, using
clear_cpu_cap() instead of setup_clear_cpu_cap() so that KVM can report
which CPU is misconfigured (KVM needs to probe every CPU anyways).
Restoring X86_FEATURE_VMX from CPUID causes KVM to think VMX is enabled,
ultimately leading to an unexpected #GP when KVM attempts to do VMXON.

Arguably, init_ia32_feat_ctl() should use setup_clear_cpu_cap() and let
KVM figure out a different way to report the misconfigured CPU, but VMX
is not the only feature bit that is affected, i.e. there is precedent
that tweaking feature bits via {set,clear}_cpu_cap() after ->c_init()
is expected to work.  Most notably, x86_init_rdrand()'s clearing of
X86_FEATURE_RDRAND when RDRAND malfunctions is also overwritten.

Fixes: 0697694564c8 ("x86/mm/pkeys: Actually enable Memory Protection Keys in the CPU")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---

I considered adding a WARN_ON check of cpuid_ecx(7) to ensure OSPKE is set
and bail if it's not, but that seemed like useless paranoia.

I don't love that using clear_cpu_cap() is a bit fragile, especially where
init_ia32_feat_ctl() is concerned, but the existing RDRAND usage, which
predates setup_pku(), makes a pretty strong argument that setup_pku() is
in the wrong.

The other potential issue is late microcode updates, which refreshes the
feature bits from CPUID, but at least in that case the kernel will print a
warning if something changed.

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 52c9bfbbdb2a..4cdb123ff66a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static __always_inline void setup_pku(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * cpuid bit to be set.  We need to ensure that we
 	 * update that bit in this CPU's "cpu_info".
 	 */
-	get_cpu_cap(c);
+	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_OSPKE);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
-- 
2.24.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-26 23:16 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-26 23:32 ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys: Manually set X86_FEATURE_OSPKE to preserve existing changes Dave Hansen
2020-02-26 23:40   ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-27  0:16 ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-27 18:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-02-27 18:20     ` Jacob Keller
2020-02-27 18:07 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200226231615.13664-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).