linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zanussi@kernel.org
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 14/23] Revert "ARM: Initialize split page table locks for vector page"
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:33:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1c7e28f28755f6bc202daf3b276f2874ac4c776.1582814004.git.zanussi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1582814004.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1582814004.git.zanussi@kernel.org>

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

v4.14.170-rt75-rc2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

-----------


[ Upstream commit 247074c44d8c3e619dfde6404a52295d8d671d38 ]

I'm dropping this patch, with its original description:

|ARM: Initialize split page table locks for vector page
|
|Without this patch, ARM can not use SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS if
|PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y because vectors_user_mapping() creates a
|VM_ALWAYSDUMP mapping of the vector page (address 0xffff0000), but no
|ptl->lock has been allocated for the page.  An attempt to coredump
|that page will result in a kernel NULL pointer dereference when
|follow_page() attempts to lock the page.
|
|The call tree to the NULL pointer dereference is:
|
|   do_notify_resume()
|      get_signal_to_deliver()
|         do_coredump()
|            elf_core_dump()
|               get_dump_page()
|                  __get_user_pages()
|                     follow_page()
|                        pte_offset_map_lock() <----- a #define
|                           ...
|                              rt_spin_lock()
|
|The underlying problem is exposed by mm-shrink-the-page-frame-to-rt-size.patch.

The patch named mm-shrink-the-page-frame-to-rt-size.patch was dropped
from the RT queue once the SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS feature (in a slightly
different shape) went upstream (somewhere between v3.12 and v3.14).

I can see that the patch still allocates a lock which wasn't there
before. However I can't trigger a kernel oops like described in the
patch by triggering a coredump.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 24 ------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
index cf4e1452d4b4..d96714e1858c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
@@ -325,30 +325,6 @@ unsigned long arch_randomize_brk(struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
-/*
- * CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS results in a page->ptl lock.  If the lock is not
- * initialized by pgtable_page_ctor() then a coredump of the vector page will
- * fail.
- */
-static int __init vectors_user_mapping_init_page(void)
-{
-	struct page *page;
-	unsigned long addr = 0xffff0000;
-	pgd_t *pgd;
-	pud_t *pud;
-	pmd_t *pmd;
-
-	pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
-	pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
-	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
-	page = pmd_page(*(pmd));
-
-	pgtable_page_ctor(page);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-late_initcall(vectors_user_mapping_init_page);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS
 /*
  * The vectors page is always readable from user space for the
-- 
2.14.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27 14:33 [PATCH RT 00/23] Linux v4.14.170-rt75-rc2 zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 01/23] Fix wrong-variable use in irq_set_affinity_notifier zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 02/23] i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 03/23] i2c: hix5hd2: " zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 04/23] x86: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 05/23] sched: migrate_dis/enable: Use sleeping_lock…() to annotate sleeping points zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 06/23] sched: __set_cpus_allowed_ptr: Check cpus_mask, not cpus_ptr zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 07/23] sched: Remove dead __migrate_disabled() check zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 08/23] sched: migrate disable: Protect cpus_ptr with lock zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 09/23] lib/smp_processor_id: Don't use cpumask_equal() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 10/23] futex: Make the futex_hash_bucket spinlock_t again and bring back its old state zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 11/23] locking/rtmutex: Clean ->pi_blocked_on in the error case zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 12/23] lib/ubsan: Don't seralize UBSAN report zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 13/23] kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to raw_spinlock_t zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` zanussi [this message]
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 15/23] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 16/23] sched: migrate_enable: Use select_fallback_rq() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 17/23] sched: Lazy migrate_disable processing zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 18/23] sched: migrate_enable: Use stop_one_cpu_nowait() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 19/23] sched/core: migrate_enable() must access takedown_cpu_task on !HOTPLUG_CPU zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 20/23] lib/smp_processor_id: Adjust check_preemption_disabled() zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 21/23] sched: migrate_enable: Busy loop until the migration request is completed zanussi
2020-03-03 19:56   ` Scott Wood
2020-03-03 20:39     ` Tom Zanussi
2020-03-03 21:19       ` Scott Wood
2020-03-03 21:54         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-05 13:38   ` David Laight
2020-03-05 17:58     ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 22/23] sched/deadline: Ensure inactive_timer runs in hardirq context zanussi
2020-02-27 14:33 ` [PATCH RT 23/23] Linux 4.14.170-rt75-rc2 zanussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1c7e28f28755f6bc202daf3b276f2874ac4c776.1582814004.git.zanussi@kernel.org \
    --to=zanussi@kernel.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).