From: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com,
dvhart@infradead.org, mika.westerberg@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, charles.d.prestopine@intel.com,
Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>,
Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"David E . Box" <david.e.box@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Relocate pmc_core_slps0_display() and pmc_core_lpm_display() to outside of CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 12:44:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d751fa4225d6be77ae91103ef19d2c23f59b9bbd.1583093898.git.gayatri.kammela@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1583093898.git.gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1583093898.git.gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
Since pmc_core_slps0_display() and pmc_core_lpm_display() is responsible
for dumping as well as displaying debug registers, there is no need for
these two functions to be defined under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
Hence, relocate these functions from under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS to above the
block.
Cc: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David E. Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 122 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
index f4a36fbabf4c..20b2f49726cf 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
@@ -612,6 +612,67 @@ static int pmc_core_check_read_lock_bit(void)
return value & BIT(pmcdev->map->pm_read_disable_bit);
}
+static void pmc_core_slps0_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, struct device *dev,
+ struct seq_file *s)
+{
+ const struct pmc_bit_map **maps = pmcdev->map->slps0_dbg_maps;
+ const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
+ int offset = pmcdev->map->slps0_dbg_offset;
+ u32 data;
+
+ while (*maps) {
+ map = *maps;
+ data = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
+ offset += 4;
+ while (map->name) {
+ if (dev)
+ dev_dbg(dev, "SLP_S0_DBG: %-32s\tState: %s\n",
+ map->name,
+ data & map->bit_mask ? "Yes" : "No");
+ if (s)
+ seq_printf(s, "SLP_S0_DBG: %-32s\tState: %s\n",
+ map->name,
+ data & map->bit_mask ? "Yes" : "No");
+ ++map;
+ }
+ ++maps;
+ }
+}
+
+static void pmc_core_lpm_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, struct device *dev,
+ struct seq_file *s, u32 offset,
+ const char *str,
+ const struct pmc_bit_map **maps)
+{
+ u32 lpm_regs[ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_lpm_maps)-1];
+ int index, idx, len = 32, bit_mask;
+
+ for (index = 0; tgl_lpm_maps[index]; index++) {
+ lpm_regs[index] = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
+ offset += 4;
+ }
+
+ for (idx = 0; maps[idx]; idx++) {
+ if (dev)
+ dev_dbg(dev, "\nLPM_%s_%d:\t0x%x\n", str, idx,
+ lpm_regs[idx]);
+ if (s)
+ seq_printf(s, "\nLPM_%s_%d:\t0x%x\n", str, idx,
+ lpm_regs[idx]);
+ for (index = 0; maps[idx][index].name && index < len; index++) {
+ bit_mask = maps[idx][index].bit_mask;
+ if (dev)
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%-30s %-30d\n",
+ maps[idx][index].name,
+ lpm_regs[idx] & bit_mask ? 1 : 0);
+ if (s)
+ seq_printf(s, "%-30s %-30d\n",
+ maps[idx][index].name,
+ lpm_regs[idx] & bit_mask ? 1 : 0);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
static bool slps0_dbg_latch;
@@ -844,33 +905,6 @@ static void pmc_core_slps0_dbg_latch(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, bool reset)
mutex_unlock(&pmcdev->lock);
}
-static void pmc_core_slps0_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, struct device *dev,
- struct seq_file *s)
-{
- const struct pmc_bit_map **maps = pmcdev->map->slps0_dbg_maps;
- const struct pmc_bit_map *map;
- int offset = pmcdev->map->slps0_dbg_offset;
- u32 data;
-
- while (*maps) {
- map = *maps;
- data = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
- offset += 4;
- while (map->name) {
- if (dev)
- dev_dbg(dev, "SLP_S0_DBG: %-32s\tState: %s\n",
- map->name,
- data & map->bit_mask ? "Yes" : "No");
- if (s)
- seq_printf(s, "SLP_S0_DBG: %-32s\tState: %s\n",
- map->name,
- data & map->bit_mask ? "Yes" : "No");
- ++map;
- }
- ++maps;
- }
-}
-
static int pmc_core_slps0_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
@@ -974,40 +1008,6 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_res_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_res);
-static void pmc_core_lpm_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, struct device *dev,
- struct seq_file *s, u32 offset,
- const char *str,
- const struct pmc_bit_map **maps)
-{
- u32 lpm_regs[ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_lpm_maps)-1];
- int index, idx, len = 32, bit_mask;
-
- for (index = 0; tgl_lpm_maps[index]; index++) {
- lpm_regs[index] = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, offset);
- offset += 4;
- }
-
- for (idx = 0; maps[idx]; idx++) {
- if (dev)
- dev_dbg(dev, "\nLPM_%s_%d:\t0x%x\n", str, idx,
- lpm_regs[idx]);
- if (s)
- seq_printf(s, "\nLPM_%s_%d:\t0x%x\n", str, idx,
- lpm_regs[idx]);
- for (index = 0; maps[idx][index].name && index < len; index++) {
- bit_mask = maps[idx][index].bit_mask;
- if (dev)
- dev_dbg(dev, "%-30s %-30d\n",
- maps[idx][index].name,
- lpm_regs[idx] & bit_mask ? 1 : 0);
- if (s)
- seq_printf(s, "%-30s %-30d\n",
- maps[idx][index].name,
- lpm_regs[idx] & bit_mask ? 1 : 0);
- }
- }
-}
-
static int pmc_core_substate_sts_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-01 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 20:44 [PATCH v3 0/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add bug fixes or code Gayatri Kammela
2020-03-01 20:44 ` Gayatri Kammela [this message]
2020-03-01 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Remove the duplicate if() to create debugfs entry for substate_live_status_registers Gayatri Kammela
2020-03-01 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Add slp_s0_offset attribute back to tgl_reg_map Gayatri Kammela
2020-03-01 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Make pmc_core_substate_res_show() generic Gayatri Kammela
2020-03-01 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix: Make pmc_core_lpm_display() generic for platforms that support sub-states Gayatri Kammela
2020-03-02 12:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-02 18:57 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-03-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add bug fixes or code Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-02 18:29 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-03-19 17:57 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-03-19 18:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-19 18:15 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-03-20 13:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 17:34 ` Kammela, Gayatri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d751fa4225d6be77ae91103ef19d2c23f59b9bbd.1583093898.git.gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--to=gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=charles.d.prestopine@intel.com \
--cc=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).