[PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data

From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:08:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326150841.10083-12-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326150841.10083-1-joro@8bytes.org>

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

Make use of dev_iommu_priv_set/get() functions and simplify the code
where possible with this change.

Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> # arm-smmu
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 3cef2bfd6f3e..a6a5796e9c41 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static bool arm_smmu_free_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx)
 static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs = smmu->smrs;
 	struct iommu_group *group;
@@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
 
 static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret;
-	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
 	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
 	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	 * domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
 	 * This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
 	 */
-	cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	if (!cfg)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
 		goto out_free;
 
 	cfg->smmu = smmu;
-	fwspec->iommu_priv = cfg;
+	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, cfg);
 	while (i--)
 		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
 
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
 		return;
 
-	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+	cfg  = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	smmu = cfg->smmu;
 
 	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
@@ -1480,15 +1480,16 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 
 	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
 
+	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL);
 	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
-	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
+	kfree(cfg);
 	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
 }
 
 static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
 {
+	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
-	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
 	struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
 	int i, idx;
-- 
2.17.1

