[v12,01/18] x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector
diff mbox series

Message ID 20200511045311.4785-2-sashal@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
  • Enable FSGSBASE instructions
Related show

Commit Message

Sasha Levin May 11, 2020, 4:52 a.m. UTC
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

When a ptracer writes a ptracee's FS/GS base with a different value, the
selector is also cleared. While this behavior is incorrect as the selector
should be preserved, most userspace applications did not notice that as
they do not use non-zero segments to begin with.

Instead, with this patch, when a tracee sets the base we will let it do
so without clearing the selector.

The change above means that a tracee that already has a selector set
will fail in an attempt to set the base - the change won't stick and the
value will be instead based on the value of the selector. As with the
above, we haven't found userspace that would be affected by this change.

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
[sasha: rewrite commit message]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 17 ++---------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff mbox series

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index f0e1ddbc2fd78..cc56efb75d275 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -380,25 +380,12 @@  static int putreg(struct task_struct *child,
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,fs_base):
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		/*
-		 * When changing the FS base, use do_arch_prctl_64()
-		 * to set the index to zero and to set the base
-		 * as requested.
-		 *
-		 * NB: This behavior is nonsensical and likely needs to
-		 * change when FSGSBASE support is added.
-		 */
-		if (child->thread.fsbase != value)
-			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_FS, value);
+		x86_fsbase_write_task(child, value);
 		return 0;
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,gs_base):
-		/*
-		 * Exactly the same here as the %fs handling above.
-		 */
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		if (child->thread.gsbase != value)
-			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_GS, value);
+		x86_gsbase_write_task(child, value);
 		return 0;