linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: joe@perches.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	arnaldo.melo@gmail.com, yhs@fb.com, kafai@fb.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, andriin@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/7] bpf: add tests for %pT format specifier
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 06:56:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1589263005-7887-8-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589263005-7887-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>

tests verify we get > 0 return value from bpf_trace_print()
using %pT format specifier with various modifiers/pointer
values.

Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk_btf.c    | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c        | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk_btf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk_btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk_btf.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7ee158
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk_btf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+struct result {
+	int ret;
+	int subtest;
+	int num_subtest;
+};
+
+/* return value of bpf_trace_printk()s is stored; if nonzero we failed. */
+static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
+{
+	struct result *resp = (struct result *)data;
+
+	*(struct result *)ctx = *resp;
+}
+
+void test_trace_printk_btf(void)
+{
+	struct result res = { 0 };
+	struct bpf_prog_load_attr attr = {
+		.file = "./netif_receive_skb.o",
+	};
+	struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
+	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL;
+	struct perf_buffer *pb = NULL;
+	struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	struct bpf_map *perf_buf_map;
+	__u32 duration = 0;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_load_xattr(&attr, &obj, &prog_fd);
+	if (CHECK(err, "prog_load raw tp", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj,
+						 "tp_btf/netif_receive_skb");
+	if (CHECK(!prog, "find_prog", "prog netif_receive_skb not found\n"))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, NULL);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_raw_tp", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	perf_buf_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "perf_buf_map");
+	if (CHECK(!perf_buf_map, "find_perf_buf_map", "not found\n"))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	/* set up perf buffer */
+	pb_opts.sample_cb = on_sample;
+	pb_opts.ctx = &res;
+	pb = perf_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(perf_buf_map), 1, &pb_opts);
+	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(pb), "perf_buf__new", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(pb)))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	/* generate receive event */
+	system("ping -c 1 127.0.0.1 >/dev/null");
+
+	/* read perf buffer */
+	err = perf_buffer__poll(pb, 100);
+	if (CHECK(err < 0, "perf_buffer__poll", "err %d\n", err))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure netif_receive_skb program was triggered
+	 * and it sent expected return values from bpf_trace_printk()s
+	 * into ring buffer.
+	 */
+	if (CHECK(res.ret <= 0,
+		  "bpf_trace_printk: got return value",
+		  "ret <= 0 %d test %d\n", res.ret, res.subtest))
+		goto close_prog;
+
+	CHECK(res.subtest != res.num_subtest, "check all subtests ran",
+	      "only ran %d of %d tests\n", res.subtest, res.num_subtest);
+
+close_prog:
+	perf_buffer__free(pb);
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(link))
+		bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	bpf_object__close(obj);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b5148df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(int));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(int));
+} perf_buf_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct result {
+	int ret;
+	int subtest;
+	int num_subtest;
+};
+
+typedef struct {
+	int counter;
+} atomic_t;
+typedef struct refcount_struct {
+	atomic_t refs;
+} refcount_t;
+
+struct sk_buff {
+	/* field names and sizes should match to those in the kernel */
+	unsigned int len, data_len;
+	__u16 mac_len, hdr_len, queue_mapping;
+	struct net_device *dev;
+	/* order of the fields doesn't matter */
+	refcount_t users;
+	unsigned char *data;
+	char __pkt_type_offset[0];
+	char cb[48];
+};
+
+#define CHECK_PRINTK(_fmt, _p, res)					\
+	do {								\
+		char fmt[] = _fmt;					\
+		++(res)->num_subtest;					\
+		if ((res)->ret >= 0) {					\
+			++(res)->subtest;				\
+			(res)->ret = bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt),	\
+						      (_p));		\
+		}							\
+	} while (0)
+
+/* TRACE_EVENT(netif_receive_skb,
+ *	TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb),
+ */
+SEC("tp_btf/netif_receive_skb")
+int BPF_PROG(trace_netif_receive_skb, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	char skb_type[] = "struct sk_buff";
+	struct __btf_ptr nullp = { .ptr = 0, .type = skb_type };
+	struct __btf_ptr p = { .ptr = skb, .type = skb_type };
+	struct result res = { 0, 0 };
+
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pT\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTc\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTN\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTx\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pT0\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTcNx0\n", &p, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pT\n", &nullp, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTc\n", &nullp, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTN\n", &nullp, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTx\n", &nullp, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pT0\n", &nullp, &res);
+	CHECK_PRINTK("%pTcNx0\n", &nullp, &res);
+
+	bpf_perf_event_output(ctx, &perf_buf_map, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU,
+			      &res, sizeof(res));
+
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-12  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12  5:56 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/7] bpf, printk: add BTF-based type printing Alan Maguire
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/7] bpf: provide function to get vmlinux BTF information Alan Maguire
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/7] bpf: move to generic BTF show support, apply it to seq files/strings Alan Maguire
2020-05-13 23:04   ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-18  9:46     ` Alan Maguire
2020-05-19  6:21       ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/7] checkpatch: add new BTF pointer format specifier Alan Maguire
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/7] printk: add type-printing %pT format specifier which uses BTF Alan Maguire
2020-05-13 23:05   ` Joe Perches
2020-05-13 23:07     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-13 23:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-05-14 23:43         ` Joe Perches
2020-05-15  0:09           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-15  0:21             ` Joe Perches
2020-05-14  0:45   ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-14 22:37     ` Alan Maguire
2020-05-15  0:39       ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/7] printk: extend test_printf to test %pT BTF-based format specifier Alan Maguire
2020-05-12  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: add support for %pT format specifier for bpf_trace_printk() helper Alan Maguire
2020-05-14  0:53   ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-18  9:10     ` Alan Maguire
2020-05-18 14:47       ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-12  5:56 ` Alan Maguire [this message]
2020-05-15  0:21   ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/7] bpf: add tests for %pT format specifier Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-13 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/7] bpf, printk: add BTF-based type printing Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-13 22:48   ` Joe Perches
2020-05-13 22:50     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-13 23:23       ` Joe Perches
2020-05-14 17:46   ` Alan Maguire
2020-05-15 18:59   ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1589263005-7887-8-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --to=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).